| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17f0d1f84336d9cd$768489$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:05:21 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <liduroFtbroU2@mid.individual.net> <vah9hs$2c43u$1@dont-email.me> <lj56luFe0luU3@mid.individual.net> <M4vxPZKxPU6U7NDCGNWCGCM0lRc@jntp> <ljahm9F9dfdU2@mid.individual.net> <vapd5l$3tffr$1@dont-email.me> <ljd51mFl74gU4@mid.individual.net> <vas655$e2la$2@dont-email.me> <o63FO6ufY9csAokzvXMpjto87yU@jntp> <vas7rr$e2la$4@dont-email.me> <17f07ef6b2cab9eb$615722$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <vasnba$e2la$22@dont-email.me> <17f093a70d87b977$760537$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <vav1pe$109ac$3@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <vav1pe$109ac$3@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 41 Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 13:05:21 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2323 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17f0d1f84336d9cd$768489$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2667 W dniu 31.08.2024 o 14:19, Python pisze: > Le 30/08/2024 à 20:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 30.08.2024 o 17:09, Python pisze: >>> Le 30/08/2024 à 13:44, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> ... >>>> No theory of mathematics include clocks. >>> >>> Sure! But a model of clocks can appear in a mathematical >>> theory. >> >> It can > > Good to know. We agree then. > >> and, what's more important - a >> relativistic idiot like to invoke >> the auyhority of mathematics for >> excusing his mad claims. >> BTW - is Pythagorean theorem a >> "hard mathematical fact"? >> Yes or not? > > The hard mathematical fact is: Euclid's Axioms => Pythagorean theorem. > > Another question? Here it comes, poor stinker: Quoting: >> Paragraph I.1. describes a procedure that looks non symmetric at >> first sight: clocks A and B are not treated exactly the same way >> (two measures for A, one for B for instance), nevertheless at the >> end of the day one can *prove* that the results are symmetric and >> that inverting A and B would lead to the same result. > This is hard mathematical facts Richard. Something beyond your head. End of quoting. No axioms now implying that? Just a hard mathematical fact?