Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:32:59 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <liduroFtbroU2@mid.individual.net> <vah9hs$2c43u$1@dont-email.me> <lj56luFe0luU3@mid.individual.net> <M4vxPZKxPU6U7NDCGNWCGCM0lRc@jntp> <ljahm9F9dfdU2@mid.individual.net> <vapd5l$3tffr$1@dont-email.me> <ljd51mFl74gU4@mid.individual.net> <vas655$e2la$2@dont-email.me> <o63FO6ufY9csAokzvXMpjto87yU@jntp> <vas7rr$e2la$4@dont-email.me> <17f07ef6b2cab9eb$615722$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <vasnba$e2la$22@dont-email.me> <17f093a70d87b977$760537$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <vav1pe$109ac$3@dont-email.me> <17f0d1f84336d9cd$768489$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <vav5e0$109ac$7@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vav5e0$109ac$7@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 51
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 13:32:59 +0000
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17f0d37a5290a3b7$678178$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
X-Received-Bytes: 3200
Bytes: 3327

W dniu 31.08.2024 o 15:22, Python pisze:
> Le 31/08/2024 à 15:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 31.08.2024 o 14:19, Python pisze:
>>> Le 30/08/2024 à 20:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> W dniu 30.08.2024 o 17:09, Python pisze:
>>>>> Le 30/08/2024 à 13:44, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> No theory of mathematics include clocks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure! But a model of clocks can appear in a mathematical
>>>>> theory.
>>>>
>>>> It can
>>>
>>> Good to know. We agree then.
>>>
>>>> and, what's more important - a
>>>> relativistic idiot like to invoke
>>>> the auyhority of mathematics for
>>>> excusing his mad claims.
>>>> BTW - is Pythagorean theorem a
>>>> "hard mathematical fact"?
>>>> Yes or not?
>>>
>>> The hard mathematical fact is: Euclid's Axioms => Pythagorean theorem.
>>>
>>> Another question?
>>
>> Here it comes:
>> Quoting:
>>  >> Paragraph I.1. describes a procedure that looks non symmetric at
>>  >> first sight: clocks A and B are not treated exactly the same way
>>  >> (two measures for A, one for B for instance), nevertheless at the
>>  >> end of the day one can *prove* that the results are symmetric and
>>  >> that inverting A and B would lead to the same result.
>>  >
>> This is hard mathematical facts Richard. Something beyond your head.
>> End of quoting.
>>
>> No axioms now implying that?
> 
> We basically need a archimedian complete ordered field. i.e. R.
> 
> Let's pick ZFC + Peano, and R (for values of the "clocks") defined as
> the set of Cauchy sequences on Q or Dedekind's cuts.

I see: a cow and a cow gives a rhino.
What a hard mathematical fact it is -
just take Peano's and define a cow
as 1 and  a rhino as 2.