Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17f225e000ca2067$792000$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 22:54:11 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com> <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com> <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com> <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4> <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vbadl3$3v15v$2@dont-email.me> <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 38
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:54:11 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1874
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17f225e000ca2067$792000$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2281

W dniu 04.09.2024 o 22:37, Python pisze:
> Le 04/09/2024 à 22:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 21:51, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>>> Den 03.09.2024 21:40, skrev rhertz:
>>>> Finally, IF you are enlightened to see the truth 
>>>
>>> ...then look at the experimental evidence:
>>>
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
>>
>> See, trash: any idiot can point  anything
>> and scream  that it is evidence.
>>
> 
> You know well, right Maciej?
> 
> Also do we.
> 
> This is why we have peer validation you know?
> 
> Peers from different times, cultures and countries. So
> this likely exclude herd effect.


Sorry, trash, the mumble of your idiot guru was
not even consistent - it has been proven. Herd
effect definitely.

> Do you have any kind of peer validation for your "proof",
> even from a SINGLE peer?

Why would I need it? I've pointed directly
2 denying themself claims derivable in the
physics of your idiot guru; I've proven
its inconsistency.