Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17f225e000ca2067$792000$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 22:54:11 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years. Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com> <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com> <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com> <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4> <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vbadl3$3v15v$2@dont-email.me> <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 38 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:54:11 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1874 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17f225e000ca2067$792000$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2281 W dniu 04.09.2024 o 22:37, Python pisze: > Le 04/09/2024 à 22:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 21:51, Paul.B.Andersen pisze: >>> Den 03.09.2024 21:40, skrev rhertz: >>>> Finally, IF you are enlightened to see the truth >>> >>> ...then look at the experimental evidence: >>> >>> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html >> >> See, trash: any idiot can point anything >> and scream that it is evidence. >> > > You know well, right Maciej? > > Also do we. > > This is why we have peer validation you know? > > Peers from different times, cultures and countries. So > this likely exclude herd effect. Sorry, trash, the mumble of your idiot guru was not even consistent - it has been proven. Herd effect definitely. > Do you have any kind of peer validation for your "proof", > even from a SINGLE peer? Why would I need it? I've pointed directly 2 denying themself claims derivable in the physics of your idiot guru; I've proven its inconsistency.