Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17f3fca566383728$173426$787920$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 22:41:10 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS. Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17f1fbbab85d22f9$723822$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <26e5a5f924f358d8d73277d7f0d7e4da@www.novabbs.com> <17f2ab3e6c5fe385$822311$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <9d92ae4f30270fdbf549da976c2ee56c@www.novabbs.com> <17f2f7ae4bf97b0c$862856$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <5cefec7c413e51fccf1c9d35e9d326e5@www.novabbs.com> <17f32dae8b060379$833219$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <1704bb78d450971fcb564e635d1cbeab@www.novabbs.com> <17f3a34f39130b57$64437$787920$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <038364b32168e1f69852a609b2444289@www.novabbs.com> <17f3ca9c0a9090e3$986467$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <1ae96b584dd2ee48092839d9f987418d@www.novabbs.com> <17f3ea032d175a4b$1051822$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <6561f1a7f3f1c07c3e3621188897b77e@www.novabbs.com> <17f3f1ea64ff519e$1036082$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <vbq6v9$347cs$1@dont-email.me> <17f3fb3ea8b1117a$1064174$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vbqa8f$347cs$3@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <vbqa8f$347cs$3@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 69 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3832 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17f3fca566383728$173426$787920$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4239 W dniu 10.09.2024 o 22:30, Python pisze: > Le 10/09/2024 à 22:15, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 10.09.2024 o 21:34, Python pisze: >>> Le 10/09/2024 à 19:24, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>> W dniu 10.09.2024 o 18:55, gharnagel pisze: >>>>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:41 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> W dniu 10.09.2024 o 16:32, gharnagel pisze: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 5:24:14 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > As expected from a relativistic piece of >>>>>> > > shit - you're projecting your own lies, >>>>>> > > backtracking and disinformation on me; >>>>>> > > and your lack of responsibility as >>>>>> > > well. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Mimicry is an infantile response, but that's >>>>>> > all Wozniak can do. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can also present a proof that the mumble >>>>>> of your idiot guru was not even consistent. >>>>> >>>>> Wozzie-liar's baseless ass-insertion has been >>>>> refuted by logical argument and measurement. >>>> >>>> Neither you, nor your fellow trash presented >>>> any. Just ravings, insults and slanders, typical >>>> for relativistic scum. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> > "The satellite clocks were designed to run slow >>>>>> > (dt') in orbit so they would appear to run >>>>>> > normally as measured from the ground (dt). >>>>>> >>>>>> And their indications - t and t' - are equal. >>>>> >>>>> Wozzie-liar keeps insisting this is so without >>>>> even a single measurement as proof. >>>> >>>> Harrie-liar keeps insisting they're not, but >>>> asked about numbers he only responds with a >>>> stream of ravings, >>> >>> You are right! Let me correct his answers then: >> >> I'll gladly let you, and remind the question too, >> poor stinker. When t (the clock indication in a >> ground GPS base) is 2024-09-12 17:00:00.0000000, t' >> (the clock indication in a GPS satellite) will be...? >> Choose any base, any satellite and consider the >> simultaneity of the base. >> What is your answer, poor stinker? Let me guess: >> some usual slanders about my bottles of vodka, >> as expected from a relativistic piece of shit. >> >> > > As "Doctor Hachel" do, do you believe that "3 = 4 for some observers" ? Your bunch of idiots has refuted the rules of basic geometry - why would the rules of basic arithmetics be any better, poor stinker? > >