Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17f4c0f3d9886b4c$1188526$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:38:30 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS. Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17f1fbbab85d22f9$723822$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <vb9ibg$3qjfp$1@dont-email.me> <17f20c8a86a53b3a$878815$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <dee836788560d6e3e1b0e66377fd1a3c@www.novabbs.com> <17f21d90cb864747$790913$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <vbacg0$3uuc5$1@dont-email.me> <17f22668d84d6e98$891677$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <vbaibl$3uuc5$7@dont-email.me> <ljt31hF8drrU2@mid.individual.net> <17f24bad52a0b2e0$836122$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <lk031uFm189U2@mid.individual.net> <17f2a094fce495a5$935996$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <lk2dfgF293iU3@mid.individual.net> <17f2e6c600f84e04$833218$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <lki8drFdmk2U6@mid.individual.net> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <lki8drFdmk2U6@mid.individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 98 Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!earthli!nntp.terraraq.uk!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:38:30 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 4473 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17f4c0f3d9886b4c$1188526$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4940 W dniu 13.09.2024 o 09:37, Thomas Heger pisze: > Am Samstag000007, 07.09.2024 um 09:49 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: >> W dniu 07.09.2024 o 09:26, Thomas Heger pisze: >>> Am Freitag000006, 06.09.2024 um 12:22 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: >>>> W dniu 06.09.2024 o 12:16, Thomas Heger pisze: >>>>> Am Donnerstag000005, 05.09.2024 um 10:26 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: >>>>>> W dniu 05.09.2024 o 08:57, Thomas Heger pisze: >>>>>>> Am Mittwoch000004, 04.09.2024 um 23:10 schrieb Python: >>>>>>>> Le 04/09/2024 à 23:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 21:30, Python pisze: >>>>>>>>>> Le 04/09/2024 à 20:21, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 19:48, gharnagel pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:09:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Common sense was warning your idiot guru. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> St. John the Divine was warning Warped Wozniak, the >>>>>>>>>>>> bald-faced liar: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> St John (fuck his absurd threats anyway) won't >>>>>>>>>>> help, t'=t in GPS, at least if by t, t' we >>>>>>>>>>> mean clock indications. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How such t and t' are clock indications. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> According to the own definition of >>>>>>>>> your [Einstein] - time is "what clocks >>>>>>>>> indicate", >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Don't be lazy, Wozniak, read! "time is "what clocks indicate" is >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is wrong! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Time does not depend on clocks, because clocks are manmade >>>>>>> artifacts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are they? And so is time, except that it is >>>>>> an abstract. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Wrist-watches, for instance, are tiny machines. >>>>> >>>>> But those machines are made by human beings. >>>>> >>>>> It would make no sense at all to assume, that nature would produce >>>>> wrist-watches or cares, whether or not humans do. >>>> >>>>> Therefore time is not related to watches! >>>> >>>> Nope. Therefore time is not related to nature. >>>> >>> >>> Physics is a natural science. >> >> There is nothing natural in physics or any >> other domain of science. And time is not a >> natural entity - neither UTimeC, nor TimeAI, >> nor any of zone times nor any other time >> existing. > > > All natural sciences (like e.g. biology or cosmology) observe natural > things, Are the measurement devices natural? > The realm within our influence is not really science, but - for > instance- engineering. For centuries physics is spreading that absurd crap of being a domain of a Higher Force outside of the influence of - physicists. Time to grow up, maybe. >> You've never observed a time, you've >> just imagined it. Sorry. > > Well, possibly... > > BUT: we observe natural phenomena, which have a certain frequency. No. We observe natural phenomena. Assigning "certain frequency" to them - is absolutely "our influence". > For instance, we observe day and night or the rythims of the seasons. > > These are natural phenomena and indicate, that nature does in fact use > something, what we humans call 'time'. No, they dont indicate anything like that. And what we humans call "time" is - what clocks indicate. Unrelated to nature at all.