Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17f4c0f3d9886b4c$1188526$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:38:30 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17f1fbbab85d22f9$723822$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <vb9ibg$3qjfp$1@dont-email.me> <17f20c8a86a53b3a$878815$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <dee836788560d6e3e1b0e66377fd1a3c@www.novabbs.com> <17f21d90cb864747$790913$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <vbacg0$3uuc5$1@dont-email.me> <17f22668d84d6e98$891677$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <vbaibl$3uuc5$7@dont-email.me> <ljt31hF8drrU2@mid.individual.net> <17f24bad52a0b2e0$836122$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <lk031uFm189U2@mid.individual.net> <17f2a094fce495a5$935996$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <lk2dfgF293iU3@mid.individual.net> <17f2e6c600f84e04$833218$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <lki8drFdmk2U6@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <lki8drFdmk2U6@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 98
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!earthli!nntp.terraraq.uk!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:38:30 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4473
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17f4c0f3d9886b4c$1188526$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4940

W dniu 13.09.2024 o 09:37, Thomas Heger pisze:
> Am Samstag000007, 07.09.2024 um 09:49 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
>> W dniu 07.09.2024 o 09:26, Thomas Heger pisze:
>>> Am Freitag000006, 06.09.2024 um 12:22 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
>>>> W dniu 06.09.2024 o 12:16, Thomas Heger pisze:
>>>>> Am Donnerstag000005, 05.09.2024 um 10:26 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
>>>>>> W dniu 05.09.2024 o 08:57, Thomas Heger pisze:
>>>>>>> Am Mittwoch000004, 04.09.2024 um 23:10 schrieb Python:
>>>>>>>> Le 04/09/2024 à 23:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 21:30, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>>> Le 04/09/2024 à 20:21, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 19:48, gharnagel pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:09:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Common sense was warning your idiot guru.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> St. John the Divine was warning Warped Wozniak, the
>>>>>>>>>>>> bald-faced liar:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> St John (fuck his absurd threats anyway) won't
>>>>>>>>>>> help,  t'=t in GPS,  at least if by t, t' we
>>>>>>>>>>> mean clock  indications.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How such t and t' are clock indications.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> According to the own definition of
>>>>>>>>> your [Einstein] - time is "what clocks
>>>>>>>>> indicate",
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't be lazy, Wozniak, read! "time is "what clocks indicate" is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is wrong!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Time does not depend on clocks, because clocks are manmade 
>>>>>>> artifacts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are they? And so is time, except that it is
>>>>>> an abstract.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrist-watches, for instance, are tiny machines.
>>>>>
>>>>> But those machines are made by human beings.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would make no sense at all to assume, that nature would produce 
>>>>> wrist-watches or cares, whether or not humans do.
>>>>
>>>>> Therefore time is not related to watches!
>>>>
>>>> Nope. Therefore time is not related to nature.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Physics is a natural science.
>>
>> There is nothing natural in physics or any
>> other domain of science. And time is not a
>> natural entity - neither UTimeC, nor TimeAI,
>> nor any of zone times nor any other time
>> existing.
> 
> 
> All natural sciences (like e.g. biology or cosmology) observe natural 
> things, 

Are the measurement devices natural?


> The realm within our influence is not really science, but - for 
> instance- engineering.

For centuries physics is spreading that absurd
crap of being a domain of a Higher Force outside
of the  influence of - physicists. Time to grow
up, maybe.

>> You've never observed a time, you've
>> just imagined it. Sorry.
> 
> Well, possibly...
> 
> BUT: we observe natural phenomena, which have a certain frequency.

No. We observe natural phenomena. Assigning
"certain frequency" to them - is absolutely
"our influence".


> For instance, we observe day and night or the rythims of the seasons.
> 
> These are natural phenomena and indicate, that nature does in fact use 
> something, what we humans call 'time'.

No, they dont indicate anything like that.
And what we humans call "time" is - what
clocks indicate. Unrelated to nature at
all.