Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:10:10 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The truth about the Lorentz Transformation.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <152fdece6d8ad07399662b8718f94e75@www.novabbs.com> <3fcb985b3950191bf86fb7ca9da3697a@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <3fcb985b3950191bf86fb7ca9da3697a@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 24
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:10:09 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1590
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17f6a3fbfe247560$1246842$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1998

W dniu 19.09.2024 o 13:58, gharnagel pisze:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 3:16:44 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> In reality, the LT is the difference in time taken for the transverse
>> and longitudinal beams.
>> Like with a river current, the longitudinal motion will be delayed more
>> than the transverse.
>> This is the difference that should have been detected by the
>> Michelson-Morley experiment.
>> As with water that is not flowing, we don't need these equations without
>> an ether.
>> Since relativity does not involve an ether, applying the Lorentz
>> Transformation in this context is nonsensical.
> 
> So what are you trying to say?
> (1) "We need the LT because there IS an ether."
> (2) "We don't need the LT because there is no ether."
> (3) You have no idea what you're trying to say.
> 
> I submit that (1) and (2) are false.

And that GPS clocks can't be real, as they don't
want to fit the delusions of your idiot guru.