Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 16:53:16 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The truth about the Lorentz Transformation.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <152fdece6d8ad07399662b8718f94e75@www.novabbs.com> <llaokuF7ikkU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <llaokuF7ikkU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 23
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 14:53:16 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1606
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17f798a05c293209$1319354$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2023

W dniu 22.09.2024 o 16:41, Sylvia Else pisze:
> On 17-Sept-24 11:16 am, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>> In reality, the LT is the difference in time taken for the transverse
>> and longitudinal beams.
>> Like with a river current, the longitudinal motion will be delayed more
>> than the transverse.
>> This is the difference that should have been detected by the
>> Michelson-Morley experiment.
>> As with water that is not flowing, we don't need these equations without
>> an ether.
>> Since relativity does not involve an ether, applying the Lorentz
>> Transformation in this context is nonsensical.
> 
> If you look for equations that describe a universe in which all 
> observers measure the same speed for light, then you arrive at the 
> Lorentz transformation. This is why Einstein and Lorentz ended up in the 
> same place 

A nonsense, lady - Lorentz was an aether man.
And -  even Your insane guru couldn't
stick to such an absurd for a long time and his
GR had to withdraw from it.