Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:48:36 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
References: <f429e76238b2d398d867e0ef814062c9@www.novabbs.com> <kij8sk-0cdm.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7f0583a34acfd$2$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6jp8sk-mikm.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7f51612b8127f$12$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <18s8sk-t8om.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7f7f5b46186da$2$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <aev8sk-sksm.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <6786f79b6fc42e31eb7e247423acfa09@www.novabbs.com> <5oo9sk-c1tn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <cf5472d9795d3c9ff78902232f8c2760@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <cf5472d9795d3c9ff78902232f8c2760@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 25
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.neodome.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:48:36 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2156
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17f82efbecd8f489$8436$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2577

W dniu 24.09.2024 o 14:15, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog pisze:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 3:37:11 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Last of the old guard here in Usenet, Pennino
>>>
>>>
>>> All the other e=mcc thumpers have died off or legged it.
>>
>> Yep, they got tired of the same old insane, babbling nonsense of the
>> mental patients that infected the group.
> 
> Why do you bother responding? In my case, I respond when I feel that
> I have a useful insight or bit of knowledge to share that the sane
> people on these groups might appreciate. For instance, I recently made
> several posts on the topic of correlated rate-change analysis, and I
> estimate that possibly 1-6 sane readers might not already have been
> familiar with the technique. But your posts merely reflect your
> disgust at the narcissistic, egomaniacal delusions held by the
> patients of this mental ward, and provide nothing new for those of
> us looking for new ideas or useful insights.

Well, relativistic doggies are trained to bark.
So they bark.