Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17f864747c21836b$15609$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:08:29 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17f834a191ab0573$4857$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <vcujbj$3841i$1@dont-email.me> <17f837b751adbf99$2192$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <mMchFSA1N2Jb2nep09tPaqyy1ho@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <mMchFSA1N2Jb2nep09tPaqyy1ho@jntp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 36 Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-2.netnews.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 05:08:28 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1690 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17f864747c21836b$15609$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2033 W dniu 24.09.2024 o 22:57, Richard Hachel pisze: > Le 24/09/2024 à 17:28, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>> >>>> 1905 - nothing about so trendy nowadays >>>> "counterexamples" against Euclidean >>>> prejudices allegedly found in massive numbers >>>> on Earth surface. >>>> >>>> Relativistic doggies have invented them - >>>> after their idiot guru announced EG false. >>>> Yes - doctoring evidence, classics of >>>> ideology oriented branches of science. >>> >>> Nobody announced Euclidean Geometry false >> >> Is it still assumed true, then? REALLY true, >> poor stinker? >> >> >> (quite the >>> opposite actually). You'll never get it. Face it >>> Maciej. >>> >>> Find another hobby. >> >> No. >> Command some glowing worms instead, poor >> stinker. > > Euclidean geometry no longer applies when we go Sure, sure. Basic mathematics doesn't apply - because an idiot has asserted. Is 2+2=22 as well - when your "theory" needs it?