Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:53:46 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_The_mathematical_Poincar=C3=A9-Lorentz_transformati?= =?UTF-8?Q?ons?=
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <42RUg_TcLuVCEPpCCJpFdI6NTVM@jntp> <vcs9r7$2q8oi$1@dont-email.me> <j9j1Tkqi5LGYmk5CzgXl1Ww8Qwk@jntp> <vcu6bv$365hb$1@dont-email.me> <humC4HOqwa8RgpL-9q5Vqw5iFsY@jntp> <vcug8l$37kdn$1@dont-email.me> <C9ZVACHmOnMgJMPVEMTfPtF0uBA@jntp> <vcv67d$3avt1$2@dont-email.me> <-1RQ6Sw8Xx8oS_AIVRs0InV8AAU@jntp> <llhkurF8lbmU5@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <llhkurF8lbmU5@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 54
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 05:53:46 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3154
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17f866ed5926d948$5767$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3508

W dniu 25.09.2024 o 07:21, Thomas Heger pisze:
> Am Dienstag000024, 24.09.2024 um 22:43 schrieb Richard Hachel:
>> Le 24/09/2024 à 22:08, Python a écrit :
>>>
>>> Quite the opposite. They don't need hints to know you are talking
>>> shit. By the way you should (you won't) think about the comparison
>>> with a siren on an ambulance going forth and back. I'll post about
>>> this soon, but you may want to find by yourself.
>>
>> The sound Doppler effect is interesting, but well... Once again, 
>> you're going to waste your time.
>> You're going to show that the Doppler effect explanation works, and 
>> nothing more: you're not going to get to the bottom of things.
>> But you're not going to show why it works, because you take my 
>> equations for total crap, despite their logic and mathematical beauty 
>> that even Einstein or Poincaré didn't have.
>>
>> But FUCK, that's not what's important, it's not your watermelon that's 
>> going to synchronize the watches, it's not your ambulance siren, but 
>> we don't care about all that.
>>
>> That's not the important thing.
>>
>> The important thing is to understand that the notion of a relativistic 
>> frame of reference is biased if we apply it to anything other than the 
>> observer himself.
>>
>> The important thing is to understand that since each observer has his 
>> own relativistic hyperplane of simultaneity, it is mandatory to go 
>> through it to correctly and perfectly describe things.
> 
> This hyperplane of the present is always perpendicular to the axis of 
> time and time is a local measure.
> 
> 'perpendicular' means here (in a complex plane) a multiplication by i 
> (the sqrt(-1)).
> 
> So time is an imaginary (pseudo-) scalar, if you regard the axes x, y 
> and z as real.
> 
> If we place the observer in the center of the coordinate system, the 
> axis of local time becomes perpendicular to the hyperplane of the present.
> 
> This is valid for all observers everywhere.
> 
>  From this would follow, that time MUST be local and is not always 
> 'parallel'.
> 

I've told you already: you can name your
Great Mystical Youdontknowwhat with - whatever.
Just leave "time" alone, this word has already
some meaning and it is important.