Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17f8857ae7f0a282$531$2754825$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:13:40 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
References: <20240913a@crcomp.net> <vcfp1q$8is2$1@dont-email.me> <6k8qejppvlaov3hrqv91bjd12k6tm52dco@4ax.com> <743tej9862rv7rjqqfh3gat27ti2eho3ve@4ax.com> <vcml6c$opt$1@panix2.panix.com> <u8a7fj1edcv9se8frmsligjpjdthmnl495@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Michael Benveniste <mhb@murkyether.com>
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
In-Reply-To: <u8a7fj1edcv9se8frmsligjpjdthmnl495@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:13:40 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1786
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com
Message-Id: <17f8857ae7f0a282$531$2754825$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
Bytes: 2147

On 9/25/2024 2:11 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:

 > Very true - which is why EVERY American nuke (excluding Little Boy,
 > the Hiroshima bomb) has been a plutonium bomb. (I have read the during
 > the 1950s they built another as an experimental device but never used
 > it and it was subsequently disassembled and melted down)

Sorry, that's not true.  The Mk-18 bomb exploded in the Ivy King test
contained no plutonium.  The current B-61 and B-83 bombs and W-80
warheads still contain U-235, and the US also tested a couple of
Uranium Hydride core bombs which were both fizzles.

The United States has a stockpile of about 480 tons of Highly
Enriched U-235, plus a ton or two of U-233, which is a sunk cost.

-- 
Mike Benveniste -- mhb@murkyether.com (Clarification Required)
Such commentary has become ubiquitous on the Internet and is widely
perceived to carry no indicium of reliability and little weight.
(Digital Media News v. Escape Media Group, May 2014).