Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:25:50 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
Subject: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.neodome.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:25:50 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1131
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1512


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.


Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.


Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.