| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17fab9157646dc09$117312$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:21:49 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <t5AySA2aWT46Ra7AsAZqm8Hc3GM@jntp> <Eo6FW0ebVNtRJTtSEACnwT1LEhc@jntp> <lm1kgtFln9eU4@mid.individual.net> <eSz70Yi5kNfROFnEqcEhT63f9RQ@jntp> <3_55BPOgqiL20L5rUo2xG_Vp8ZQ@jntp> <lm5j7fFaceeU1@mid.individual.net> <ENzxkMbrs76KQ5-SwANAkYb5npU@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <ENzxkMbrs76KQ5-SwANAkYb5npU@jntp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 58 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 19:21:48 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2380 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17fab9157646dc09$117312$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2781 W dniu 02.10.2024 o 21:00, Python pisze: > Le 02/10/2024 à 20:54, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> Am Dienstag000001, 01.10.2024 um 14:54 schrieb Python: >> >>>>>>> But in a relativistic universe where each observer has his own >>>>>>> hyperplane of present time? >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you mean by "hyperlane"? >>>>> >>>>> The set of all points, which could be connected to an events by a >>>>> hypothetical signal with infinite velocity builds actually a three >>>>> dimensional space. >>>>> >>>>> In RT-lingo, this is a hyperplane (of the present). >>>>> >>>>> Imagine you would 'flatten' space to a 2-dimensional sheet. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> TH >>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>> Why do you answer him? You can see that he is crazy. >>>> >>>> He claims to be a great expert in relativity, but he is incapable of >>>> understanding what a simple "hyperplane" is. >>>> >>>> R.H. >>> >>> I do know what a hyperplane is :-) Neither Thomas nor you do :-) >>> >> >> 'Hyperplane' has a sigtly different meaning than 'hyperplane of >> present time'. >> >> But apparently your question was about the 'hyperplane of the present' >> in context of RT and not about the general case of a hyperplane in >> mathematics. >> >> In case of RT, my explanation was correct! > > > The mathematical definition of hyperplane match with the definition > of hyperplane of simultaneity Your bunch of idiots has no definition of simultaneity and you're a lying stinker, poor stinker. (not "present") sure. "present" is a special case of simultaneity, even such an idiot should be able to get it.