| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17faba4fac98e8ee$117996$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:44:19 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <t5AySA2aWT46Ra7AsAZqm8Hc3GM@jntp> <Eo6FW0ebVNtRJTtSEACnwT1LEhc@jntp> <lm1kgtFln9eU4@mid.individual.net> <eSz70Yi5kNfROFnEqcEhT63f9RQ@jntp> <3_55BPOgqiL20L5rUo2xG_Vp8ZQ@jntp> <lm5j7fFaceeU1@mid.individual.net> <ENzxkMbrs76KQ5-SwANAkYb5npU@jntp> <17fab9157646dc09$117312$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <t7HDa-LC8zhLQn7dL8gCWtJryP0@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <t7HDa-LC8zhLQn7dL8gCWtJryP0@jntp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 64 Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 19:44:18 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2833 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17faba4fac98e8ee$117996$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3300 W dniu 02.10.2024 o 21:26, Python pisze: > Le 02/10/2024 à 21:21, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 02.10.2024 o 21:00, Python pisze: >>> Le 02/10/2024 à 20:54, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>>> Am Dienstag000001, 01.10.2024 um 14:54 schrieb Python: >>>> >>>>>>>>> But in a relativistic universe where each observer has his own >>>>>>>>> hyperplane of present time? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you mean by "hyperlane"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The set of all points, which could be connected to an events by a >>>>>>> hypothetical signal with infinite velocity builds actually a >>>>>>> three dimensional space. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In RT-lingo, this is a hyperplane (of the present). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Imagine you would 'flatten' space to a 2-dimensional sheet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TH >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you answer him? You can see that he is crazy. >>>>>> >>>>>> He claims to be a great expert in relativity, but he is incapable >>>>>> of understanding what a simple "hyperplane" is. >>>>>> >>>>>> R.H. >>>>> >>>>> I do know what a hyperplane is :-) Neither Thomas nor you do :-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> 'Hyperplane' has a sigtly different meaning than 'hyperplane of >>>> present time'. >>>> >>>> But apparently your question was about the 'hyperplane of the >>>> present' in context of RT and not about the general case of a >>>> hyperplane in mathematics. >>>> >>>> In case of RT, my explanation was correct! >>> >>> >>> The mathematical definition of hyperplane match with the definition >>> of hyperplane of simultaneity >> >> >> Your [snip slander] has no definition >> of simultaneity > > We have. The short legs of your lie has been already tested, but why not to do it again. E1 an event taking place at a GPS satellite, E2 - an event taking place in a GPS ground base (or ground facility, if you wish) - how are you going to determine whether E1 is simultaneous to E2 or not, poor lying stinker?