Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:10:48 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <lm6tneFg6sqU2@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <lm6tneFg6sqU2@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 28
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 09:10:48 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1561
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17fae6527aab0e0b$152096$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2004

W dniu 03.10.2024 o 09:00, Thomas Heger pisze:
> Am Mittwoch000002, 02.10.2024 um 11:25 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>>
>>
>> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
>> solar system is measuring the length
>> of solar day. What is the result predicted
>> by the Einsteinian physics?
>> One prediction is - 99766. From the
>> postulates. The second prediction is -
>> 86400. From definition.
>> And similiarly with the prediction of
>> a measurement of a meridian.
> 
> If you measure the length of the solar day


I don't. It is not a thread about
measurments of a day -  it's a thread
about deriving conclusions from
some idiotic mumble.