Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 22:33:20 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <77dfc4d8fc3dcc74323fad9d3db1aa77@www.novabbs.com> <vdmueo$3s8f5$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vdmueo$3s8f5$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 9
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 20:33:20 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 962
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17fb0b912ce78741$147423$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1325

W dniu 03.10.2024 o 22:25, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

> So it was one single clock in the world which defined the second.
> This was very impractical.
> So in 1960 SI defined  the second based on the Cs atom.

And, as anyone can check at GPS  - this utter
absurd is even more impractical.