Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 07:32:46 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
References: <c596f37eaeac082fce8f501ced6c4cd6@www.novabbs.com> <l0iusk-6k8p.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17fa89eb836365a5$121040$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <rjq0tk-4dhs.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <0f163c5194ace41af71d6c5b3c9641de@www.novabbs.com> <g201tk-f2ps.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <f748b62dd174a60499571fe91f87d5ba@www.novabbs.com> <uof3tk-0vk01.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <75a0474a69c10683e1a5bb4dc558eae7@www.novabbs.com> <08r3tk-0t311.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <a32ea42841dc616462284b590945ed31@www.novabbs.com> <fc54tk-u6h11.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <fc54tk-u6h11.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 77
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 05:32:45 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4298
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17fb2900d5b5fb61$165930$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4726

W dniu 04.10.2024 o 05:52, Jim Pennino pisze:
> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 0:59:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:43:28 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:03:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:30:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 02.10.2024 o 02:51, Jim Pennino pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 9:06:50 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What follows from Arindamic physics is the permanent motion machine,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating energy indefinitely. A minor version of the workings of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> universe, where energy is created and disdipated in its infinite
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vastness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arindam bets that when he makes such a machine the penisninos (they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> number in billions) will still continue to abuse and ignore him. Frauds
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and fools are like that!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apes being apes, ape. No matter what nonsense is spouted by beloved or
>>>>>>>>>>>> feared alpha-apes. That explains the success of relativity theories, so
>>>>>>>>>>>> incredibly ridiculous.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The success of relativity theories is because every experiment since
>>>>>>>>>>> 1905
>>>>>>>>>>> confirms them,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, it is because some fanatic religious
>>>>>>>>>> maniacs like yourself lie experiments
>>>>>>>>>> confirm them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So where is your experiment with data and math that contradicts Einstein
>>>>>>>>> or are you just yet another arm waving and babbling crackpot?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The inertia violation experiment using the new rail gun designed by
>>>>>>>> Arindam validates Maxwellian electrodynamics and throws out
>>>>>>>> Einstein-Feynman electrodynamics. As lack of reaction is predicted by
>>>>>>>> F=Bil for the former and NOT by the latter where energy from current
>>>>>>>> moves as particles in a loop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean your silly "expriment" with no data and no math Anirandam?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unlike the computer art presented as science by the esteemed e=mcc
>>>>>
>>>>> The first experimental proofs of Einstein's theories were done long
>>>>> before there was any such thing as computer art crackpot.
>>>>
>>>> There are no experimental proofs of Einstein's theories,
>>>
>>> Thousand upon thousand Arindam.
>>
>> Name one.
> 
> OK, since you seem so hung up on e=mc^2 I'll start with special
> relativity.
> 
> Fizeau experiment
> Michelson–Morley experiment
> Kaufmann–Bucherer–Neumann experiments
> Trouton–Noble experiment
> Rayleigh and Brace experiments
> Trouton–Rankine experiment
> Ives–Stilwell experiment

And absurd assertions they're supporting
somehow not even consistent babble of the
idiot.