Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17fbc3a5ac6c619c$201819$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 06:46:39 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_I_dare_to_relativists_to_explain_local_time=3A_t-vx?= =?UTF-8?Q?/c=C2=B2?= Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com> <ebCdnU-bKuOJYmD7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6a64a60eb15efe9a5449ade234d05804@www.novabbs.com> <fc3e047c7de75fd713b8844393a5234e@www.novabbs.com> <vds6da$sl6n$1@dont-email.me> <71951787b5f1c60661ff5e5c10adbfe2@www.novabbs.com> <vds9gu$sl6n$3@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <vds9gu$sl6n$3@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 34 Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 04:46:38 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2079 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17fbc3a5ac6c619c$201819$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2423 W dniu 05.10.2024 o 23:04, Paul.B.Andersen pisze: > Den 05.10.2024 22:39, skrev rhertz: >> >> DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DIDN'T GIVE A SINGLE EXPLANATION ABOUT >> THE 49 nsec THAT APPEAR DUE TO THE vx/c² FACTOR OF THE LOCAL TIME?. >> OR WHY THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TIME IN BOTH FRAMES (NOT RELATED >> TO THE GAMMA FACTO OF TIME DILATION) FOR THIS PARTICULAR SPEED AND >> POSITION? >> >> >> YOU WRITE, WRITE AND WRITE BUT CAN'T ESCAPE FROM THE FACT THAT YOU >> DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT LOCAL TIME. YOU (AND OTHERS) CAN'T JUST EXPLAIN >> IT. > > Quite. > I and others write and write but Richard Hertz understand nothing > whatever we write. > > He can only repeat over and over that SR is nonsense, > and that all physicist born after 1900 are frauds since > they claim that SR is experimentally verified and never > falsified. On the other hand - you and your fellow idiots can only repeat that crap of alleged "verification" and "confirmations". And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden by the idiots "improper" clocks keep measuring improper t'=t in improper seconds. And asking you some detailed questions only results with a stream of insults and slanders, or plonking.