Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17fbc3a5ac6c619c$201819$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 06:46:39 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_I_dare_to_relativists_to_explain_local_time=3A_t-vx?= =?UTF-8?Q?/c=C2=B2?=
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com> <ebCdnU-bKuOJYmD7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6a64a60eb15efe9a5449ade234d05804@www.novabbs.com> <fc3e047c7de75fd713b8844393a5234e@www.novabbs.com> <vds6da$sl6n$1@dont-email.me> <71951787b5f1c60661ff5e5c10adbfe2@www.novabbs.com> <vds9gu$sl6n$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vds9gu$sl6n$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 34
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 04:46:38 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2079
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17fbc3a5ac6c619c$201819$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2423

W dniu 05.10.2024 o 23:04, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
> Den 05.10.2024 22:39, skrev rhertz:
>>
>> DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DIDN'T GIVE A SINGLE EXPLANATION ABOUT
>> THE 49 nsec THAT APPEAR DUE TO THE vx/c² FACTOR OF THE LOCAL TIME?.
>> OR WHY THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TIME IN  BOTH FRAMES (NOT RELATED
>> TO THE GAMMA FACTO OF TIME DILATION) FOR THIS PARTICULAR SPEED AND
>> POSITION?
>>
>>
>> YOU WRITE, WRITE AND WRITE BUT CAN'T ESCAPE FROM THE FACT THAT YOU
>> DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT LOCAL TIME. YOU (AND OTHERS) CAN'T JUST EXPLAIN
>> IT.
> 
> Quite.
> I and others write and write but Richard Hertz understand nothing
> whatever we write.
> 
> He can only repeat over and over that SR is nonsense,
> and that all physicist born after 1900 are frauds since
> they claim that SR is experimentally verified and never
> falsified.

On the other hand - you and your fellow
idiots can only repeat that crap of alleged
"verification" and "confirmations".
And in the meantime in the real world -
forbidden by the idiots "improper" clocks
keep measuring improper t'=t in improper
seconds.
And asking you some detailed questions
only results with a stream of insults
and slanders, or plonking.