Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17fcc2dc3e2f52e1$245237$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:43:27 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_I_dare_to_relativists_to_explain_local_time=3A_t-vx?= =?UTF-8?Q?/c=C2=B2?= Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com> <6a64a60eb15efe9a5449ade234d05804@www.novabbs.com> <fc3e047c7de75fd713b8844393a5234e@www.novabbs.com> <ITL7AA8psYi3SFitwMx5bsT692A@jntp> <vdtj91$1678k$1@dont-email.me> <1k5RVUJbA9eJCvwPwgrHGmo0kGk@jntp> <ve05m6$1l5mj$1@dont-email.me> <DsCNxsCYVkQ6O8Xc6trMTSQzKZg@jntp> <ve5k3c$2k0ti$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <ve5k3c$2k0ti$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 29 Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 10:43:28 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1794 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17fcc2dc3e2f52e1$245237$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2138 W dniu 09.10.2024 o 11:58, Mikko pisze: > On 2024-10-07 08:45:14 +0000, Richard Hachel said: > >> Le 07/10/2024 à 10:21, Mikko a écrit : >>> What evdence there is to show that the semantics of times. positions, >>> durations and lengths is not well understood by almost everybody? >>> >>> Mikko >> >> A great quantum physicist was once asked the question: "Is it true >> that there are only three physicists in the world who understand >> quantum physics?" >> He replied: "And who is the third?" >> The same goes for special relativity. > > No, it doesn't. Special Relativity is fairly simple and easy to understand. And not even consistent. You've got a proof, all you can do about it is pretending you didn't notice. > Nothing makes simultaneity relative. It simpy is relative. No it is not. Anyone can check GPS, that's where nad lies of your mad bunch end.