Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:00:47 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: What is "local time"?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <M0ZS0z9of5m3zPojotZe3TGunn4@jntp> <1aec54a219198abeee623f4762a3f105@www.novabbs.com> <17fead611f0d4f22$260472$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <GCRBkG15sYAgJq8IFpUGyd-0A1o@jntp> <17febd840835ea5f$313547$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <2efd75a85dc80d75d54ecfe4d61baf34@www.novabbs.com> <17fef24802f71607$317544$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <828449197c1a677b8addcf873e0753ea@www.novabbs.com> <17ff07975c53dae2$291901$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <de29387700b8be4b86e4d4b0a0244990@www.novabbs.com> <17ff27c0bf619b9b$331545$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <cf15b557dc9050b733df63cbce378fca@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <cf15b557dc9050b733df63cbce378fca@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 43
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:00:46 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2527
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ff458b4dc0e9f5$328780$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2949

W dniu 17.10.2024 o 15:26, gharnagel pisze:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 5:54:50 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 17.10.2024 o 06:07, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > > > That's only ONE definition.  Wozniak is a
>> > > > poor observer because he refuses to see the
>> > > > other one.  This one:
>> > > >
>> > > > "Time is what keeps everything from happening at
>> > > > once" -- Ray Cummings
>> > >
>> > > I don't refuse to see something just
>> > > because it is some mystical bullshit
>> > > lacking any content.
>> >
>> > So nature has no content
>>
>> So the "definition" of yours has no content.
> 
> So Wozniak believes time is a human invention, and
> that's its ONLY definition, yet trees grow, die
> and decay.  He must believe that they didn't do
> so before clocks were invented :-))
> 
>> > > It may. Time remains  purely virtual abstract
>> > > invented by humans - for the purpose of
>> > > describing.
>> >
>> > So Wozniak pretends he's living in a frozen universe.
>> > Or he's just lying again.
>>
>> No, I don't. Harnagel is just lying again.
> 
> I'm just trying to understand Wozniak's bizarre assertion
> that time only exists because of human inventions. 

See, poor idiot: after humans invent something
they usually give a name to it. One of their
abstract inventions got the name "time".

Can't be that simple? Oh, yes, it can.