Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<180062909234a641$1$960661$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:03:51 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: What is "local time"? Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <M0ZS0z9of5m3zPojotZe3TGunn4@jntp> <17ff07975c53dae2$291901$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <de29387700b8be4b86e4d4b0a0244990@www.novabbs.com> <17ff27c0bf619b9b$331545$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <cf15b557dc9050b733df63cbce378fca@www.novabbs.com> <17ff458b4dc0e9f5$328780$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <7hBSHqODdmzOxvkYW2rHwe0bflk@jntp> <560a787dd047af24cb2d26c0df9d8bf4@www.novabbs.com> <17ff5a29e4c77b19$328786$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <75cb434bebeb2fe12d12d7a2853d9a8f@www.novabbs.com> <17ffefe53a5d737f$388369$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <034658236b03a26f263ea046c8cb72e4@www.novabbs.com> <18001395473403d1$388387$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <2f6d6e9a6668a1d82602efe56989a495@www.novabbs.com> <18002cdc3a84d188$402227$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3450ae874bcf46a1df0873d7be5d2197@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <3450ae874bcf46a1df0873d7be5d2197@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 61 Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.neodome.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 06:03:49 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2883 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <180062909234a641$1$960661$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3311 W dniu 21.10.2024 o 02:04, gharnagel pisze: > On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 13:39:41 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> >> W dniu 20.10.2024 o 14:09, gharnagel pisze: >> > >> > Wozniak spits and screams. The truth hurts, eh? >> >> It does, sure, and I didn't claim what you say I did; >> yet another slander from a poor little piece of lying >> relativistic shit. > > Wozniak is lying, and a very stupid lie at that. So, a quoting where I'm claiming that humans invented trees please. > >> So, returning to time: I've provided about 20 examples >> of grey elephants/ times which are not a part of nature. >> >> You've provided no example of a pink elephant/time >> which is a part of nature. > > Quote: > I can give examples of millions of objects NOT invented > by humans and named by humans. For starters: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_stars None of your examples is a time, unfortunately. > > Wozniak gave a mere 20 examples of time being a human > invention and he claimed that people name things that > they invented. Do you claim that humans don't name things they have invented, poor trash? , which refutes > Wozniak's claim that time MUST be a human invention. No it doesn't. It just shows that a star doesn't have to be a human invention. Sure. > And then I showed that in the philosophy of time, time > is NOT a human invention. The quote: As said, your philosophical proofs that an elephant must be pink - are not interesting me.