Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 07:56:19 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: What is "local time"?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <M0ZS0z9of5m3zPojotZe3TGunn4@jntp> <560a787dd047af24cb2d26c0df9d8bf4@www.novabbs.com> <17ff5a29e4c77b19$328786$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <75cb434bebeb2fe12d12d7a2853d9a8f@www.novabbs.com> <17ffefe53a5d737f$388369$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <034658236b03a26f263ea046c8cb72e4@www.novabbs.com> <18001395473403d1$388387$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <2f6d6e9a6668a1d82602efe56989a495@www.novabbs.com> <18002cdc3a84d188$402227$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3450ae874bcf46a1df0873d7be5d2197@www.novabbs.com> <180062909234a641$1$960661$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <12f0205f99919dda284477768d1eedc8@www.novabbs.com> <1800798a972c741a$1$958250$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <33e3261bfcabcf65c9cb8fde0fd0f83a@www.novabbs.com> <1800d1822f08bcca$374$958250$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6706e048873c7d3e2f56567ae93fb31d@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <6706e048873c7d3e2f56567ae93fb31d@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 107
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.neodome.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 05:56:19 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4315
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1800ff50e6209035$722$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4693

W dniu 23.10.2024 o 05:57, gharnagel pisze:

> Does everything happen at once?  No, it doesn't.  Did
> the invention of clocks keep everything from happening
> at once?  No, it didn't. 


Sure, sure - time(i.e. "what clocks indicate")
had nothing in common with that.



> "'Seeing pink elephants' is a euphemism for hallucinations
> caused by delirium tremens or alcoholic hallucinosis,
> especially the former."
> 
> Wozniak needs to lay off the booze.

slander
noun [ C or U ]
uk  /ˈslɑːn.dər/ us  /ˈslæn.dɚ/
a false spoken statement about someone that
damages their reputation, or the making of
such a statement.

BTW:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_elephant_(animal)
I was a bit mistaken about real elephants never
pink. Time - part of nature is rather like
purple elephants.



> 
>> > > Dealing with sticks and rods humans started to
>> > > imagine a perfect rigid rod. The origin of
>> > > your mystical time bullshit is similar.
>> >
>> > Wozniak's disinforming again.  The "rigid rod" is like
>> > a map:  They're both useful simplistic models to consider
>> > deeper problems
> 
>> So was your gedanken time - when it was
>> similar to real ones, i.e. before your
>> idiot guru revolutionized it.
> 
> Irrelevant baloney intended to misdirect and obfuscate.
> 
>> Anyway, it never existed. Just like "rigid
>> rod".
> 
> More irrelevant bool poop.  Much of Wozniak's beloved
> "information" that he fondles doesn't exist, either.
> Apparently, he doesn't believe in maps 

What is apparent to an utter relativistic idiot doesn't
matter.

> Wozniak is lying and obfuscating in a sorry attempt to
> misdirect the discussion.  The question of whether time
> is a human invention has NOTHING to do with relativity.

An assertion is no way an argument, poor
trash.


> 
>> > > Nothing like that ever existed in the reality. There
>> > > are only entities like UTC, TAI, zone times.
>> > > All are human invented, all have nothing in
>> > > common with nature.
>> >
>> > So humans created time so everything doesn't happen at
>> > once?
>>
>> So.
> 
> So Wozniak is wrong that time is ONLY a human invention.

Nope. Harnagel is wrong that it isn't. He admits
himself - he doesn't know much about the subject -
but being a DK idiot he still acts as if he knew
everything.


>> They can be. It's just not as easy as Orwell
>> thought and The Shit's doggies didn't succeed;
>> not that they didn't try hard, of course.
> 
> Wozniak is full of merde.  The question of time is MUCH
> older that relativity

And so is the mistake of your moronic church
of physics.


>>
>> Yes, they are. UTC doesn't change for a fast
>> observer, other real times neither. Sorry,
>> poor trash.
> 
> More attempts to redefine the discussion about relativity.
> Complete bull merde (pardon my French).


Just pointing some properties of a real time.