Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:14:52 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: What is "local time"?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <M0ZS0z9of5m3zPojotZe3TGunn4@jntp> <75cb434bebeb2fe12d12d7a2853d9a8f@www.novabbs.com> <17ffefe53a5d737f$388369$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <034658236b03a26f263ea046c8cb72e4@www.novabbs.com> <18001395473403d1$388387$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <2f6d6e9a6668a1d82602efe56989a495@www.novabbs.com> <18002cdc3a84d188$402227$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3450ae874bcf46a1df0873d7be5d2197@www.novabbs.com> <180062909234a641$1$960661$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <12f0205f99919dda284477768d1eedc8@www.novabbs.com> <1800798a972c741a$1$958250$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <33e3261bfcabcf65c9cb8fde0fd0f83a@www.novabbs.com> <1800d1822f08bcca$374$958250$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6706e048873c7d3e2f56567ae93fb31d@www.novabbs.com> <1800ff50e6209035$722$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <57b2fe1bdb386b158cb6a7c290c5c01e@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <57b2fe1bdb386b158cb6a7c290c5c01e@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 116
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:14:51 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4562
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1801173f18d6025d$351$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4994

W dniu 23.10.2024 o 14:28, gharnagel pisze:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 5:56:19 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 23.10.2024 o 05:57, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > Does everything happen at once?  No, it doesn't.  Did
>> > the invention of clocks keep everything from happening
>> > at once?  No, it didn't.
>>
>>
>> Sure, sure - time(i.e. "what clocks indicate")
>> had nothing in common with that.
> 
> Dishonest Wozniak dis-invented the rest :-)
> 
>> > Did humans invent time so everything doesn't
>> > happen at once?  No, they didn't.
> 
> Which refutes Wozniak's baloney-filled assertion
> that time is strictly a human invention.

Nope. It just shows that time has nothing
in common with that.


>> > Wozniak needs to lay off the booze.
>>
>> slander
>> noun [ C or U ]
>> uk  /ˈslɑːn.dər/ us  /ˈslæn.dɚ/
>> a false spoken statement about someone that
>> damages their reputation, or the making of
>> such a statement.
> 
> Wolowitz has no proof that it's slander.

Why would I need it a proof, poor trash?
Am I a prosecutor?
Without proof it is still a slander. What
was that Socrates was saying about a slander?





> 
>> BTW:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_elephant_(animal)
>> I was a bit mistaken about real elephants never
>> pink. Time - part of nature is rather like
>> purple elephants.
> 
> Of course there are no pink elephants.  They only exist
> in Willowwisp's besotted imagination :-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_elephant_(animal)
Not quite.

But still, for sure there is no time in nature.




>> What is apparent to an utter relativistic idiot doesn't
>> matter.
> 
> Whether or not time is solely a human invention has nothing
> to do with relativity. 

An assertion of an utter relativistic idiot
(being simultaneously a piece of lying shit,
BTW) is no way an argument.



>> Nope. Harnagel is wrong that it isn't. He admits
>> himself - he doesn't know much about the subject -
>> but being a DK idiot he still acts as if he knew
>> everything.
> 
> :-))
> 
> Does everything happen at once?  No, it doesn't.  Did
> the invention of clocks keep everything from happening
> at once?  No, it didn't.  Did humans invent time so
> everything doesn't happen at once?  No, they didn't.

Conclusion: time has little in common with things
not happening at once.


>> > > Yes, they are. UTC doesn't change for a fast
>> > > observer, other real times neither. Sorry,
>> > > poor trash.
>> >
>> > More attempts to redefine the discussion about relativity.
>> > Complete bull merde (pardon my French).
>>
>> Just pointing some properties of a real time.
> 
> Whether or not time is solely a human invention has nothing
> to do with relativity.

Somehow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_standard
none of the real times mentioned there
dilates.
See, poor trash, as a human invention time
and clocks are obeying common sense. Not
the nature. Nor some religious maniacs
self-appointed to speak in the name of
the nature.
You may gedanke a dilating time and clocks
indicating it - sure. Or you may gedanke
purple elephants; similar bullshit.