Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 15:50:22 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <1802015b6d406d16$84191$945036$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <N0jk2yPuwauKiytcHCBdTA0dhW0@jntp>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <N0jk2yPuwauKiytcHCBdTA0dhW0@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 27
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 13:50:23 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1452
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <180204ed25c5106f$84192$945036$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1858

W dniu 26.10.2024 o 14:48, Python pisze:
> Le 26/10/2024 à 14:44, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>>
>>
>> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
>> solar system is measuring the length
>> of solar day. What is the result predicted
>> by the Einsteinian physics?
>> One prediction is - 99766. From the
>> postulates. The second prediction is -
>> 86400. From definition.
> 
> 
> No.
> 

Some  fanatic idiots screaming "NO!!!"
can't change anything, the mumble of
their beloved guru was not even consistent
and it has been proven.