Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:29:09 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The puzzle science is solving
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <18028c43ae3207f6$154608$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <29b2833796a5e458d9a73af6b0c42bed@www.novabbs.com> <oQr_EXdbPn0FCtPjv5NJ8GBqQtI@jntp> <1802a86653504235$206958$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <KZhMQORhgUvz_-5HcU9N2EfLhl4@jntp>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <KZhMQORhgUvz_-5HcU9N2EfLhl4@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 52
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:29:10 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2552
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1802ae069b7f9ad9$232057$945036$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2937

W dniu 28.10.2024 o 17:14, Python pisze:
> Le 28/10/2024 à 16:46, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 28.10.2024 o 15:07, Python pisze:
>>> Le 28/10/2024 à 13:05, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:10:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not "how things really are".
>>>>
>>>> I agree.
>>>>
>>>>> It is "which word sequences are good ones".
>>>>
>>>> I disagree.  Humans build maps of reality.
>>>> They're called scientific theories.
>>>
>>> If "word sequences that are good ones" means that de-compiled forms 
>>> of the programs we have in our brains i.e. logic, maths and physics 
>>> (for instance) are matching the actual programs that are correct
>>
>> But there is no one-and-unique "correct".
>> There are just local optimums, and they're
>> floating (what is good now doesn't have to be
>> good in 100 years).
> 
> We could agree on that. Rather than local optimums I would say that they 
> are more complete "High level" implementations of the "machine language" 
> in your brains.

Bigger and more powerful software doesn't mean
"more complete". It's just bigger and more
powerful. And so is our knowledge - compared
to the knowledge of our ancestors. There is
no "complete" state it's targetting.



> 
>>> (because evolution made sur they do)
>>
>> In some centuries  [SR] will be
>> only remembered as an antipattern of "how
>> and why you should never make a scientific
>> theory or any description of anything".
> 
> Your mistake is to deny that SR, as well as NM, are fitting very well 
> with this line of thinking.

So is marxism-leninism. At least - as long as
its enthusiasts are evaluating that. But none
of your idiot gurus had any real knowledge
about the process of putting words together.