Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:48:25 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The puzzle science is solving
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <18028c43ae3207f6$154608$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <29b2833796a5e458d9a73af6b0c42bed@www.novabbs.com> <1802a70b63ba7651$211662$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3d4794ce8f630c8be24cac151d5a420c@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <3d4794ce8f630c8be24cac151d5a420c@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 43
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:48:26 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1901
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1802af13bf435c3c$232058$945036$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2324

W dniu 28.10.2024 o 18:11, gharnagel pisze:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:21:16 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 28.10.2024 o 13:05, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:10:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> > >
>> > > It is not "how things really are".
>> >
>> > I agree.
>> >
>> > > It is "which word sequences are good ones".
>> >
>> > I disagree.  Humans build maps of reality.
>> > They're called scientific theories.
>>
>> Maps? Harrie, poor idiot, maps are
>> drawings. Scientific theories are
>> descriptions; they're word sequences.
> 
> (sigh!)  Wozniak goes nuts again!
> 
> https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/map
> 
> a plan, a portrayal.
> 
> plan: "scheme, design, way of doing things, idea"
> 
> Wozniak seems to have trouble with understanding
> that words have a range of meaning. 

Rather, Harnagel seems to have a problem
with understanding that the range of
meaning for  "plan" is different than the
range of meaning for "map".

>> Well, exact science was never good
>> at this kind of problems.
> 
> There is no such thing as "exact science." 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_sciences