Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:29:29 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: What is "local time"?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <M0ZS0z9of5m3zPojotZe3TGunn4@jntp> <2c9a79da53ef18243e1b9e936a17abba@www.novabbs.com> <1801813c89e0da16$21694$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <0b18524a059027e24f86429ab82cfff3@www.novabbs.com> <1801b5d314856682$72197$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <702afca9d798e66d3278f4afe56697d4@www.novabbs.com> <1801b94f806fce87$71092$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <a36151f9c22d26cba9bd8ae92790e403@www.novabbs.com> <1801ee271e1007bf$86744$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <4f56935998a4b88eace75825f9bf4e25@www.novabbs.com> <18023f25a0fecf93$85859$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <1a2a82a87ee63a406accf45d2754152b@www.novabbs.com> <18028bfe050dac11$154418$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <ea0ad46133cce6cd3f8c3ca8cca6a5b8@www.novabbs.com> <1802a7f0c6571184$206767$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <e06a25b84c50477487d38d89b17d8cf0@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <e06a25b84c50477487d38d89b17d8cf0@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 70
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.neodome.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:29:30 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3513
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1802b151648137d9$238674$945036$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3931

W dniu 28.10.2024 o 18:49, gharnagel pisze:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:37:38 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 28.10.2024 o 13:24, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:05:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Still, J've shown you about 40 examples of a time which
>> > > are  obviously a human invention.
>> >
>> > Irrelevant.  It takes only ONE valid example to the contrary
>> > to refute the assertion
>>
>> And providing 40 I surely did an overkill
>> of your babbling of time being a part of
>> nature and dilating.
> 
> I said nothing about dilating.

Really? Didn't you say that time is dilating?
Well, isn't it, poor trash?


 > Wozniak keeps> trying to insert relativity into a topic that
> has nothing to do with relativity. 

Even amongst many idiocies you said in this and
other threads - this one is rather amazing.

>> > "a: the measured or measurable period during which an
>> > action, process, or condition exists or continues"
>>
>> Well, 40 of mine examples fit here, you've presented
>> no example fitting and being a part of nature.
> 
> A "measurable period" does not prove that the "period"
> is a human invention.  Wozniak is grasping at straws.

Well, if  it's an outcome of a human invented
procedure... anyway, you may use any of the times
- human inventions here and it's going to fit.
How did you imagine that it's describing
something that isn't a human invention?



>>
>> Well, from 40 of mine examples not every one fits
>> here (UTC and zone times are almoust continous, but
>> not quite) but many do. You've presented
>> no example fitting and being a part of nature.
> 
> So Wozniak that "time is a nonspatial continuum" means
> that humans created time and space.

They created at least 40 different times and a lot
more of different spaces.


>> Asserting about someone's booze with no
>> other reason but disliking him - absolutely
>> is.
> 
> Woznial insists on being dead wrong even when he's proven
> dead wrong:

And Harnagel go for slandering in such case.
That's what The Shit's doggies are trained
for.