Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:31:01 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Lots of Christian Atheists here, ain't they?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <6721E640.73FF@ix.netcom.com> <vfu6hh$2aadj$1@dont-email.me> <299cf6e3e18f97e68f3d41b13e9d5740@www.novabbs.com> <vfua50$2auo1$1@dont-email.me> <e280b650-d42c-e12a-b038-f8233b3ef3de@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <vg0dsl$2pa4s$3@dont-email.me> <e75ab5b2-93db-904a-0d32-3b6a5d41933c@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <vg1ume$355le$1@dont-email.me> <672891ff$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <672891ff$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 37
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!news.furie.org.uk!piper.furie.org.uk!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:31:01 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2306
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1804c7179d5f3206$361491$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2814

W dniu 04.11.2024 o 10:21, J. J. Lodder pisze:
> Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>> Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy.
>>>
>>>
>>> as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel among
>>> us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not hunting here.
>>
>> There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not only
>> LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee (otherwise
>> known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician humanity has
>> ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this group
>> such a magnet for nutters? Not even talk.origins has so many.
> 
> Indeed, the regulars in t.o. are even complaining
> about a lack of nutters.
> 
> This is understandable. Unlike the nutters here,
> who are merely against it all, the t.o. nutters
> had a more or less coherent alternative theory.
> (Intelligent Design)
> 
> With the collapse of intelligent design much of the nuttery collapsed.
> (as you well know)
> The nutterdom here has no such claim at respectability.
> They don't have an alternative to teach.
> So, beig pure nuttery, it is less prone to collapse.

It would be sure much better and easier
for relativistic doggies to fight me if I
had some  idiocies comparable to theirs.