Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:40:48 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Lots of Christian Atheists here, ain't they?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <6721E640.73FF@ix.netcom.com> <vfu6hh$2aadj$1@dont-email.me> <299cf6e3e18f97e68f3d41b13e9d5740@www.novabbs.com> <vfua50$2auo1$1@dont-email.me> <e280b650-d42c-e12a-b038-f8233b3ef3de@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <vg0dsl$2pa4s$3@dont-email.me> <e75ab5b2-93db-904a-0d32-3b6a5d41933c@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <vg1ume$355le$1@dont-email.me> <672891ff$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <1804c7179d5f3206$361491$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <ae6992d4-1156-349f-9927-f7687650b60e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <ae6992d4-1156-349f-9927-f7687650b60e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 60
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 18:40:47 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3112
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1804d7ff20a99168$362262$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3501

W dniu 04.11.2024 o 17:17, kazu pisze:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> W dniu 04.11.2024 o 10:21, J. J. Lodder pisze:
>>> Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:
>>>>
>>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>>> Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel among
>>>>> us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not hunting here.
>>>>
>>>> There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not only
>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee (otherwise
>>>> known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician humanity has
>>>> ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this group
>>>> such a magnet for nutters? Not even talk.origins has so many.
>>>
>>> Indeed, the regulars in t.o. are even complaining
>>> about a lack of nutters.
>>>
>>> This is understandable. Unlike the nutters here,
>>> who are merely against it all, the t.o. nutters
>>> had a more or less coherent alternative theory.
>>> (Intelligent Design)
>>>
>>> With the collapse of intelligent design much of the nuttery collapsed.
>>> (as you well know)
>>> The nutterdom here has no such claim at respectability.
>>> They don't have an alternative to teach.
>>> So, beig pure nuttery, it is less prone to collapse.
>>
>> It would be sure much better and easier
>> for relativistic doggies to fight me if I
>> had some  idiocies comparable to theirs.
>>
>>
> 
> what is it about relativity that you disagree? speed of light constant 
> in all reference frames?

That wouldn't be disagreeing; even your insane guru
was unable to stick  to such an absurd for a long time
and his GR has withdrawn from it.

And what I disagree? First - pretending that
desynchronized clocks are somehow better  than
synchronized ones, because of some moronic symmetry;
second - rejecting basic [Euclidean] math.
Third - last but not least - your mad, fanatic
arrogance.


> 
> 
> 
>