Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<18100e2d5ddd2efe$37$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:17:25 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Why a time of the real world must be galilean Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <180f1778e64eec8d$354$1238888$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <180f492784c71945$10$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <xCziMg3j9uZQYXe2wMbruh7Grkk@jntp> <180f679ba2214b38$30$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <q_tA9UFX02u5-3B010MCiLA7Ark@jntp> <180fa0ddc9b0360f$31$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <ox0jyhk1mc_KBOCrib7_6M0bkbI@jntp> <180fc4a84f1891a8$1162$1228337$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <jHWvZ3O-GEB5fyb9dVjRPDx9Ivg@jntp> <180fe70a094d1a10$33$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <Ia2LLeutVzilYv0TJojTZUmFydw@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <Ia2LLeutVzilYv0TJojTZUmFydw@jntp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 41 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 07:17:24 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2271 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <18100e2d5ddd2efe$37$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2688 W dniu 10.12.2024 o 20:45, Python pisze: > Le 10/12/2024 à 20:20, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> ... >>> How do you practically check your "t = t'" equations for clocks >>> standing next to each other? >> >> I read the numbers they display and I compare them. > > Good. > >> Then for distant mutually at rest clocks with no >>> gravity involved? >> >> I don't. > > Sad. You don't. You can't. We can. No you can't either. Sorry, poor stinker. There is a small technical detail: those "distant clocks" are not moving wrt each other. How do you ensure that? By assuming the condition a priori; and you can do it because you're only applying your moronic procedure in your moronic gedanken delusions. Am I incorrect, poor stinker? You're only believing your idiocy is a great practical procedure - because your mad religion is pumping you with gedanken fairy tales where it works fine. > Putting two clocks aside is not quite a delusion. It was not about "putting two clocks aside". it was about putting them aside in some space lacking any gravity and after ensuring (by some untold magic) that they're not moving wrt each other. Practically - both these requirements are some utter absurd.