From: Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux>
Subject: Who Knows Hardware?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
User-Agent: Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; d7a48b4 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 20
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 15:26:35 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 15:26:35 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 969
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-Id: <18107773bf7e2ff8$26525$296518$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
Bytes: 1379

My new Intel Xeon processor has Uncore frequency scaling that can be
controlled by kernel module "intel_uncore:"

https://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/INTEL_UNCORE_FREQ_CONTROL.html

This apparently can optimize access to the Intel "uncore" chip
components, including processor cache.

Would it be advisable to enable this?

Who am I kidding?  Ain't no one gonna answer.

I shall enable it.

Cateee is great.  That resource has saved my bacon many times in
the past.


-- 
Hail Linux!  Hail FOSS!  Hail Stallman!