Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:41:38 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <lsati1FireqU1@mid.individual.net> <kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 17
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:41:37 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1210
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1811b5de4a4c732c$4277$1238888$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1573

W dniu 16.12.2024 o 16:36, Richard Hachel pisze:
> Le 16/12/2024 à 15:59, Sylvia Else a écrit :
>> Einstein defined the the word precisely, in the sense in which he used 
>> it in his analysis. Since it is a definition, it needs only be applied.
>>
>> As it happens, his definition is very easy to understand, though 
>> nothing turns on that.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> Einstein does not define anything at all. For the speed of light, 
> Einstein postulates that it is invariant, but 

But even such an idiot was unable to stick to such
an idiocy for a long time and his GR shit had to
withdraw.