From: Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux>
Subject: Re: Old Hardware
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <pan$9505a$d037b8eb$bc31d320$63334f69@linux.rocks> <vk24i4$1gl43$2@solani.org>
User-Agent: Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; d7a48b4 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 28
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:12:20 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:12:20 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1617
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-Id: <1812de3879b52319$48950$1833$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
Bytes: 2011

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:52:04 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:


> 
> I have a Win10, a Win7, and a WinXP machine tightly stored away, but
> easily accessible just for the occasions that Linux cannot do the job.
> Do you know what those occasions are?... They're almost always occasions
> when I'm doing something sensitive and formal that have deadlines to
> them. That's when Linux fails. This is thanks to what people, Flud?
> Who's responsible for this?
>

You'll have to be far more specific.  Exactly what job(s) causes GNU/Linux
to fail?

I use GNU/Linux for all things, personal and paid($$$$), and have 
absolutely no need for Microslop.  Indeed, for me, using Microslop
would severely hamper my productivity -- and my productivity extends
into many areas.

However, I am literally forced to maintain a Microslop machine solely
because certain web sites that I need to access will fail with GNU/Linux.
The fault here is the incompetent "developers" who cannot do their
piddly-diddly coding according to standards.


-- 
Hail Linux!  Hail FOSS!  Hail Stallman!