Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:46:46 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <lsati1FireqU1@mid.individual.net> <1811b1bbc2b0581a$4009$1258271$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <EQHypnRrrfm9KIsfn1hoIuNDvWw@jntp> <vjrvi5$1or3g$1@dont-email.me> <q2T1xxfs2anW3avnE-Mbv6h_TtQ@jntp> <vk6it0$2j18$1@dont-email.me> <y6NFsdinreqq-hxcRLvq7hZ4gpc@jntp> <vk92ht$kijv$1@dont-email.me> <HQFxpJvcwIpLhNIeMKqLNQ292YE@jntp> <vk9qtr$p308$1@dont-email.me> <6s8YJGP42H0C-4FoL8dk0ahw7GU@jntp> <vkrfq7$vgn7$1@dont-email.me> <67740ddb$0$16835$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <67740ddb$0$16835$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 86
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 15:46:46 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3785
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <18164d947dcf7c2e$41204$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4192

W dniu 31.12.2024 o 16:29, J. J. Lodder pisze:
> Paul.B.Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
> 
>> Den 22.12.2024 22:15, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>> Le 22/12/2024 à 20:56, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>>>> Den 22.12.2024 14:35, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>>>> Le 22/12/2024 à 14:00, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I want you to answer my simple questions in a way I can understand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will reformulate my question so you will only have to
>>>>>> answer "YES" or "NO".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here we go:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Richard, do you own a watch of some kind?
>>>>>>    'yes' or 'no', please!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you use the internet to set your watch?
>>>>>> (or is your watch a computer on the net?)
>>>>>>    'yes' or 'no', please!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you use a mobile network to set your watch?
>>>>>> (or is your watch a mobile phone?)
>>>>>>    'yes' or 'no', please!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you use GPS to set your watch?
>>>>>> (or is your watch a GPS-receiver?)
>>>>>>    'yes' or 'no', please!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you use public radio or TV to set your  watch?
>>>>>> (or is your watch on a radio receiver or a TV?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you expect your watch to show the same as the clock on
>>>>>> the wall of a railway station or an airport (within a minute or so)?
>>>>>>    'yes' or 'no', please
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything you say is true.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I can answer "yes, absolutely" to all your questions.
>>
>>>>
>>>> OK. Thanks for a clear answer.
>>>>
>>>> You expect your watch to be synchronous with the clock on the wall
>>>> of a railway station or an airport an airport within a minute or so.
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>> You still don't understand what I'm trying to tell you (it's been four
>>> decades).
>>
>> Yes, your clear answer to my question was easy to understand.
>>
>> My question was:
>> "Do you expect your watch to show the same as the clock on
>>    the wall of a railway station or an airport?"
>>
>> Your answer was 'yes'.
>>
>> So you expect the clock on the railway station to be synchronous with
>> your clock.
>>
>>>
>>> We breathe, we blow.
>>>
>>> We have a little coffee, and we hold our heads in our hands.
>>>
>>> WE CANNOT absolutely synchronize two watches with each other, because it
>>> is physically impossible.
>>
>> Right.
>> There is no such thing as "absolute synchronisation".
>> It is meaningless because it is no "absolute time".
>>
>> Your clock and my clock and the clock on the railway station
>> in Paris are synchronous in the non-rotating Earth centred
>> frame of reference (ECI-frame).
> 
> You keep repeating this mistake.
> TAI, hence UTC, is defined as time on the rotating geoid,

And there is no such thingg according to your
moronic religion.