Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<1816d7a199d1df0c$37941$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 10:56:38 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: How did Einstein Develop his Field Equations? When: A. He admitted having little math Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <676bf17f$0$29726$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <67716585$0$12919$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <UtSVKtQfprgFYB_14RS2Z8d7rNI@jntp> <vl5hul$38ijk$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <vl5hul$38ijk$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 81 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 09:56:35 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3660 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <1816d7a199d1df0c$37941$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4133 W dniu 02.01.2025 o 09:15, Athel Cornish-Bowden pisze: > On 2025-01-01 22:03:42 +0000, Python said: > >> Le 01/01/2025 à 22:59, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a >> écrit : >>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 15:06:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>> >>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 11:50:23 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> How did Einstein Develop his Field Equations? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When: >>>>>>> A. He admitted having little math and no ability in non-Euclidean >>>>>>> geometry. >>>>>>> B. He always relied on someone else to do his math. >>>>>>> C. He denied getting it from Hilbert. >>>>>>> D. He never said who he got it from. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Answer: >>>>>>> He stole them from Hilbert. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hilbert disagreed, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jan >>>>> Here are two other versions of the quote; >>>>> >>>>> "Every street boy in Gottingen knows as much elliptical geometry as >>>>> Einstein. But the equations are his." >>>>> >>>>> "Every boy in the streets of Gottingen understands more about >>>>> four-dimensional geometry than Einstein. Yet, in spite of that, >>>>> Einstein >>>>> did the work and not the mathematicians." — David Hilbert >>>>> >>>>> There is only one way to interpret this. That is Hilbert pointing out >>>>> that obviously Einstein did not invent the field equations because he >>>>> could not. >>>> >>>> That is your way, and it is obviously wrong. >>>> Hilbert chides his fellow mathematicians, and hence himself, >>>> for not having found the correct equation of general relativity, >>>> despite their superior technical skills. >>>> Hilbert goes on to state that: >>>> In spite of that it was Einstein who got there. >>>> >>>> You may guess what Hilbert did next: (see the ref supplied by RH) >>>> ==== >>>> On December 4th, Hilbert even nominated Einstein for election as a >>>> corresponding member of the Göttingen Mathematical Society. >>>> (So to his own backyard, where all those superior Gottingen >>>> mathematicians dwelt. It was the highest honour he could bestow >>>> personally) >>>> ==== >>>> >>>> Just what you would expect Hilbert to do, >>>> if he considered Einstein an incompetent bungler >>>> who had just stolen his results. >>>> >>>> You had better forget about all this. >>>> You are wrong about it, period. >>>> >>>> Jan >>> You're a deceitful asshole with no regard for truth or logic. You have >>> not answered the argument given above by Hachel that Hilbert was under >>> their thumb which is clearly the truth. >> >> "Laurence Clark Crossen" we know that you are a troll, posting >> nonsense here only to get attention. >> >> What's your point anyway? > > Do crackpots have points? What's Wozzie's point, for example? Of course I have, you're just too dumb to ever comprehend it, Corrie Bowie.