Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:11:53 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <181a583f1cd5cda6$86779$1316151$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <3zLm3mDTMPtyf6dcZJW5ew_XWEA@jntp> <181a5e0c344e8261$86735$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <XWiXX89pvAx66mKmIVZPwgwnfD8@jntp> <181a5eb81e767dc4$86737$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <HPF6j-4BEHrZMeoOSNYRAHyP3Tw@jntp> <181a6036c3d29170$90809$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <K1sjSIRidGRyhD2K8Ndavvy6DFs@jntp> <181a63878c3a598f$86738$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 102
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:11:52 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4633
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <181a8ab40daa2f3b$84542$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5049

W dniu 14.01.2025 o 11:23, Python pisze:
> Le 14/01/2025 à 00:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 23:14, Python pisze:
>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 23:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:58, Python pisze:
>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:45, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:40, Python pisze:
>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:33, Demented maniac, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:50, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 20:47, Idiotic kook Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:31, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein deserved the Nobel Prize for *numerous* reasons:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
>>>>>>>>>> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
>>>>>>>>>> would be, and he has written it clearly
>>>>>>>>>> enough for anyone able to read 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Even you admitted that Poincaré would likely have kicked you in 
>>>>>>>>> the a** 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wozniak.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, I didn't. A lie as usual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You did. Amnesia now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I didn't As you insist - maybe it's
>>>>>> rather a delusion than a lie. Woll, both
>>>>>> very possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway you did.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. As said - either a lie or a delusion.
>>>> Both typical for a relativistic idiot in general
>>>> and for you especially.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See,  - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
>>>>>>>> guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is nothing to do as you've never done anything like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I did, I've pointed directly 2 denying
>>>>>> themself predictions of his,  physics.
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't, they're laughable nonsense.
>>>>
>>>> Of course they are, they're consequences
>>>> of the physics of your idiot guru.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Only you were screaming. You got precise refutations of you silly 
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I've got some utterly ridiculous
>>>> assertions, extremly stupid even considering
>>>> the usual level of the Shit's worshippers.
>>>> Well,  nothing more was ever expected, of
>>>> course. It's changing nothing, the mumble
>>>> of your idiot guru was not even consistent,
>>>> it's been proven and a fanatic piece of shit
>>>> screaming "NOOOOO!!!" spitting and slandering is
>>>> changing nothing. Sorry.
>>>
>>> If it were a proof how come nobody but you recognizes it as such?
>>
>> Nobody is expecting a bunch of
>> fanatic idiots to recognize and accept
>> a proof that their divine guru was just
>> a mumbling crazie.
>> Expecting something like that from
>> a bunch of brainwashed fanatics wouldn't
>> be wise, would it?
> 
> A proof is a human production, right? As long as an alleged one is not 
> considered valid by a significant community outside of its author it is 
> not a proof.

Sorry, poor stinker - pointing 2 denying
themself predictions of the physics of
your idiot guru is a proof of its inconsistency.
No matter whether you and your fellow trash
are accepting it or not.


> You can insult people, it doesn't change the fact that what you have 
> nothing like a proof.

You can insult people, it doesn't change the
fact that I've pointed directly 2 denying
themself predictions of the physics of your
idiot guru. I.e - I've demonstrated a proof
of its inconsistency.
Now - go fuck yourself with your pseudophilosophy.
It's as worthless as The Shit of your idiot guru.