Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:42:51 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <181a5eb81e767dc4$86737$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <HPF6j-4BEHrZMeoOSNYRAHyP3Tw@jntp> <181a6036c3d29170$90809$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <K1sjSIRidGRyhD2K8Ndavvy6DFs@jntp> <181a63878c3a598f$86738$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp> <181a8ab40daa2f3b$84542$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <8kbiEMBjBP64SDxCqmK9hPf8iW8@jntp> <181a97a8cae7837c$86741$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <NJuSuqDy0JPTakkJauWYlZVmOr8@jntp>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <NJuSuqDy0JPTakkJauWYlZVmOr8@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 143
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:42:51 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 6442
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <181a997dca85fca1$84543$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 6842

W dniu 14.01.2025 o 16:14, Python pisze:
> Le 14/01/2025 à 16:09, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 13:16, Python pisze:
>>> Le 14/01/2025 à 12:11, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 11:23, Python pisze:
>>>>> Le 14/01/2025 à 00:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 23:14, Python pisze:
>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 23:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:58, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:45, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:40, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:33, Demented maniac, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:50, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 20:47, Idiotic kook Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:31, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein deserved the Nobel Prize for *numerous* reasons:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be, and he has written it clearly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough for anyone able to read 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even you admitted that Poincaré would likely have kicked 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you in the a** 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wozniak.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I didn't. A lie as usual.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You did. Amnesia now?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, I didn't As you insist - maybe it's
>>>>>>>>>> rather a delusion than a lie. Woll, both
>>>>>>>>>> very possible.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway you did.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. As said - either a lie or a delusion.
>>>>>>>> Both typical for a relativistic idiot in general
>>>>>>>> and for you especially.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> See,  - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
>>>>>>>>>>>> guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing to do as you've never done anything like.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I did, I've pointed directly 2 denying
>>>>>>>>>> themself predictions of his,  physics.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You didn't, they're laughable nonsense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course they are, they're consequences
>>>>>>>> of the physics of your idiot guru.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Only you were screaming. You got precise refutations of you silly 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope, I've got some utterly ridiculous
>>>>>>>> assertions, extremly stupid even considering
>>>>>>>> the usual level of the Shit's worshippers.
>>>>>>>> Well,  nothing more was ever expected, of
>>>>>>>> course. It's changing nothing, the mumble
>>>>>>>> of your idiot guru was not even consistent,
>>>>>>>> it's been proven and a fanatic piece of shit
>>>>>>>> screaming "NOOOOO!!!" spitting and slandering is
>>>>>>>> changing nothing. Sorry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If it were a proof how come nobody but you recognizes it as such?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nobody is expecting a bunch of
>>>>>> fanatic idiots to recognize and accept
>>>>>> a proof that their divine guru was just
>>>>>> a mumbling crazie.
>>>>>> Expecting something like that from
>>>>>> a bunch of brainwashed fanatics wouldn't
>>>>>> be wise, would it?
>>>>>
>>>>> A proof is a human production, right? As long as an alleged one is 
>>>>> not considered valid by a significant community outside of its 
>>>>> author it is not a proof.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, poor stinker - pointing 2 denying
>>>> themself predictions of the physics of
>>>> your idiot guru is a proof of its inconsistency.
>>>> No matter whether you and your fellow trash
>>>> are accepting it or not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You can insult people, it doesn't change the fact that what you 
>>>>> have nothing like a proof.
>>>>
>>>> You can insult people, it doesn't change the
>>>> fact that I've pointed directly 2 denying
>>>> themself predictions of the physics of your
>>>> idiot guru. I.e - I've demonstrated a proof
>>>> of its inconsistency.
>>>> Now - go fuck yourself with your pseudophilosophy.
>>>> It's as worthless as The Shit of your idiot guru.
>>>
>>> Just because *you* say so? Come on!
>>
>>
>> Because I've pointed directly 2 denying
>> themself predictions of the physics of
>> your idiot guru - and the ONLY answer
>> from you and your fellow idiots is
>> just some mad ravings.
>> Not that it's any surprise considering
>> who you are and what your church is.
>>
>>
>>> You have demonstrated nothing.
>>
>> Just because *you* say so? Come on, poor
>> stinker.
>>
>>> And are just a demented ranting kook lost in the middle of nowhere.
>>
>>
>> See, poor stinker - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
>> guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it
>> apart of spitting, insulting and slandering.
>> And you're just doing what you can for your beloved
>> Shit and your beloved church.
> 
> Again, how come you are incapable of convincing ANYONE neither here nor 
> elsewhere that your rant is a proper proof of anything?

Again - a fanatic idiot can never be convinced
that he is a fanatic idiot, no surprise in
that.
And as for rants - they are all yours. I've
pointed directly 2 denying themself predictions of
the physics of your idiot guru, i.e. provided
a proof of its inconsistency.