Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:52:38 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <181a63878c3a598f$86738$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp> <181a8ab40daa2f3b$84542$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <8kbiEMBjBP64SDxCqmK9hPf8iW8@jntp> <181a97a8cae7837c$86741$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <NJuSuqDy0JPTakkJauWYlZVmOr8@jntp> <181a997dca85fca1$84543$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <fyLcmxRQ7IFokA-xggYiYIaufuw@jntp> <181a9d3f85e42e77$84544$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <EvuI3XyKZjggDbuGot9mEKvi08M@jntp>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <EvuI3XyKZjggDbuGot9mEKvi08M@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 52
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:52:38 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2669
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <181aa092d5504cf5$86782$1316151$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3076

W dniu 14.01.2025 o 18:23, Python pisze:
> Le 14/01/2025 à 17:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 16:49, Python pisze:
>>> Le 14/01/2025 à 16:42, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> ..
>>>>> Again, how come you are incapable of convincing ANYONE neither here 
>>>>> nor elsewhere that your rant is a proper proof of anything?
>>>>
>>>> Again - a fanatic idiot can never be convinced
>>>> that he is a fanatic idiot, no surprise in
>>>> that.
>>>
>>> All of Humanity but Maciej Wozniak are "fanatic idiots"? You need > 
>>> medical help, Maciej.
>>
>> Al of humanity comes for  discussing on a
>> physics newsgroup? You need medical help,
>> Python.
> 
> Did you ever confront your "proofs" to anyone outside of here? 

I confront it with people here and
I can see that apart of spitting,
slandering and desperately dodging
questions they can do exactly nothing
to it. So, sorry, it is good.


> Did you ever asked yourself, given how short and simple are your 
> "proofs", why NOBODY has proposed your arguments as "proofs" that SR was 
> inconsitent?
> 

That is a simple one. You're selling your
idiocies as a voice of Nature Herself,
somehow magically independent on mere
human made definitions. Don't you?
Somehow, people buy this mystical crap
- they trust you. Happens.



>> Both refutation an meaningful arguments are,
>> unfortunately, just some delusion of yours.
>> Samely as being "all of humanity".
> 
> Did you ever consider that, maybe, maybe you are too stupid and/or too 
> stubborn to seriously consider these arguments?

No. Do you?