Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 07:00:19 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <7db98cab57f6050f8daf2f88b9bfdcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vm6lel$2jd9o$1@dont-email.me> <4568ec448c26221aea0c57a6bfc7b29b@www.novabbs.com> <vm8bd2$2v29k$1@dont-email.me> <5705554ddaf14095a8c1720c33efc599@www.novabbs.com> <vmblgh$3kl6v$1@dont-email.me> <181b42b814b94f1d$84581$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <BH4xs8rjWMdN15I1rhXjw7nMXx4@jntp> <181b440696ba4c68$90954$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <HJj0zuuE8BtyPn443u4Llspmu98@jntp>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <HJj0zuuE8BtyPn443u4Llspmu98@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 57
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feed.abavia.com!abe007.abavia.com!abe003.abavia.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 06:00:18 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3056
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <181b65715f475c6e$1$1407297$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3505

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:56, Python pisze:
> Le 16/01/2025 à 20:47, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:25, Python pisze:
>>> Le 16/01/2025 à 20:23, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:11, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>>>>> Den 15.01.2025 18:36, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:00:31 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I ask you again:
>>>>>>> Why do you not understand that Einstein and many other physicists
>>>>>>> have shown that it is a fact that GR predicts Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your opinion of GR is irrelevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GR's prediction for the gravitational deflection
>>>>>>> is confirmed by a number of experiments:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
>>>>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
>>>>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
>>>>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
>>>>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You know, experimental evidence _is_ the reality.
>>>>>>> Your opinion is fantasy.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If the derivation is wrong, it doesn't predict. You didn't understand
>>>>>> what Poor said. Poor has directly addressed the "4" in your equation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Understand this:
>>>>> The equation Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is correct
>>>>
>>>> A pity it's not [GR] equation for
>>>> light deflection.
>>>
>>> Really? So what is it?
>>
>> A formula valid in a model joining
>> good, old Euclidean geometry with
>> some minor schemas of The Shit.
>>
>> Poincare has been explaining - you
>> can reject EG, but it's stupid and
>> will serve you ill. So with all
>> of those ideological screams  of its
>> alleged incompability with the
>> reality - your bunch of idiots is
>> still applying it  everywhere and
>> pretending it is not.
> 
> I didn't ask for incoherent babble. I asked for a formula.

And I answerred about the formula.
It's not my fault that Poincare is
too much for your birdy brain.