Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:56:04 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
Subject: The Shit is predicting no light deflection
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:56:05 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1177
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <181b6f0904119b4f$1$1417112$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1667

That's right: according to The Shit
light paths in vacuuum are always
straight/geodesic lines.

Why do you think gravitational
lensing is non-euclidean and
ordinary lensing is not? You
have no clue, sure, but it's
simple: in gravitational lensing
paths of light are (or at least
your idiot  guru is asserting they
are) straight/geodesic lines. If
they are  curved - gravitational
lensing is no more non-euclidean
than ordinary lensing.

So - how did it come that all the
relativistic idiots have agreed
on light deflection, against the
assertions of their insane guru?

Poincare has been partially explaining
that, but you're too stupid for
Poincare's. Full explaination would
be totally uncomprehendable
for you.