Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:37:08 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Does the Math Show A Doubling of the Gravitational Deflection of Starlight?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <abf8cad4f878963879f7fb527ad8a82e@www.novabbs.com> <vmisdr$27m23$1@dont-email.me> <a09510415a3c9e9083ff8fa27f92840d@www.novabbs.com> <vml0qk$2vspj$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vml0qk$2vspj$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 29
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 08:37:08 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1678
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <181c59bdd4678f96$34$1427260$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2039

W dniu 20.01.2025 o 09:17, Mikko pisze:

>> Accepting that space curves requires accepting that parallel lines meet.
>> Is that rational? Can the eclipse experiments prove that parallel lines
>> meet? Then how can they prove the doubling deflection? They can't.
> 
> Is it rational to accept that we can see the same object in two (or more)
> different directions? 

Yes, poor halfbrain, nothing extraordinary
or non-euclidean in that, ordinary lensing
(or even a mirror) can make it no worse
than gravitational lensing.
Believing (or pretending to believe) it's
a kind of miracle only possible thanks to the
infinite wisdom of your idiot guru is just
plain  stupidity; but, of course - you are
plainly stupid.


Doesn't matter. The fact is that some distant
> galaxies
> are observed in two or more different directions.

NOTHING non-euclidean in that. Unless
we assume that a light path in vacuum
doesn't deflect - as it was assumed in
your GR  shit.