Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 21:37:30 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Which CPM systems are most popular?
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
References: <1827d25a31347fea$5830$1520955$70dd3a6b@news.thundernews.com> <He-cnbSd5M4hGSL6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: John <john@somewhere>
In-Reply-To: <He-cnbSd5M4hGSL6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 40
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.thundernews.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 03:37:31 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2335
Organization: Thundernews - www.thundernews.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@thundernews.com
Message-Id: <1827f371d03d363e$4860$19313$2edd646e@news.thundernews.com>
Bytes: 2729

On 2/26/25 3:16 PM, Captain Nemo wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:31:04 -0600, John wrote:
> 
>> Every once in a while I see an Intertec Superbrain come to auction and
>> consider buying it. I was wondering what are the most popular, and the
>> most desirable (collectible?) CPM systems.  I know the S-100 systems are
>> in a class by themselves.  But I'm talking about the 'integrated
>> systems'.  Like the Osbornes,Kaypros Superbrains, etc.
>> Does anyone track this sort of thing?
> 
> I've never seen a list based on popularity.
> 
> Osborne sold well, until they sunk their own company.
> Kaypro also did well until MS-DOS did them in.
> Eagle is another one people seem to like, but it seems that many of those
> machines never made it into this era.
> 
> The problem is that CP/M machines were business machines.  So even though
> they sold well, they didn't sell at the level of the TRS-80, for example.
> Also, the odds of us seeing one as kids was really low.  I never saw a
> Kaypro, for example, "in the wild" when I was a kid.  I saw ads for them,
> though.
> 
> I mention that last point because many of us collect the computers that we
> remember from when we were kids - either we used them or lusted over them.


Also,for some reason the 'appliance computers' (home computers) of the 
era repelled me.  Apples, TRS80s,and Commodores to me were nothing but 
expensive toys.

I naturally gravitated towards the 8080/Z80 realm of business focused 
machines - which were descendants of the original 'hobby computers'.

I suppose I saw myself as more of a 'computer hobbyist' than a 'gamer'.
Even today, I'm more likely to have a soldering iron in hand than a game 
controller.

-J