Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<182e5261e737c349$828687$1494137$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 22:44:47 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR. Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <8d05bbe123c740f2934b31e367a92231@www.novabbs.com> <65006a73bc196736fbec3d54e21fa717@www.novabbs.com> <vr9tmf$q4vi$1@dont-email.me> <0c0b2bb49434e61879858abed2b9d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <vrbtgj$2k1q7$1@dont-email.me> <a1b3bbfca4b1e9797d98903a77f0cf59@www.novabbs.com> <f58a6ba75e73908078c5576f74ffe329@www.novabbs.com> <9ed9e92086e0d99fde7d81edfced643a@www.novabbs.com> <0082c223a6c8e6952b11ec32b83c473b@www.novabbs.com> <d38ac7fb8de3a1e3c8f08908a6e1953a@www.novabbs.com> <40f0e2c10ed1e2c2d24989b4c7917802@www.novabbs.com> <vrf73v$1iffb$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <vrf73v$1iffb$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 10 Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 21:44:46 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1472 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <182e5261e737c349$828687$1494137$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 1916 W dniu 19.03.2025 o 20:53, Paul.B.Andersen pisze: > > FACT: The measurements in 1977 _proved_ that the proper time τ₁ > of the unadjusted clock in NTS-2 advanced faster than While some unadjusted clocks can advance faster or slower - nothing surprising in that - insisting that there is something "proper" in them is just a wild assertion of a brainwashed idiot you are.