Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 20:57:38 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Albert in Relativityland
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <3ce0bf632f46843f8cc0a3f45fdc0acd@www.novabbs.com> <vshcgq$3ojsg$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vshcgq$3ojsg$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 19
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:57:37 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1345
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <183246ce4b40863e$1447533$1481196$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1727

W dniu 01.04.2025 o 20:54, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
> Den 31.03.2025 22:44, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> Here is a good review of some critiques of relativity.
>>
>> "A critical introduction to “Einstein‟s theory of relativity”
>>
>> "written by a non-scientist for other non-scientists who have some
>> intellectual curiosity about this famous theory, with pictures in it and
>> 140 references and citations to authority. 30 pages."
>> by Raleigh Amesbury
> 
> Written for non scientist who understand nothing of any theory
> of physics, and thus believe they are qualified to make
> the following sharp analysis of SR and GR.

Paul, poor trash, the mumble of your idiot
guru was not even consistent (just like yours),
it doesn't need any "sharp" analysis.