Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<18327d2ba85c3c5b$885443$1488192$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 13:33:52 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <5fd51fea02c903ebf93a2ef52d94ca20@www.novabbs.com> <vshbig$3ojsg$1@dont-email.me> <bd85b5fefec8ef329d396c87d6acf4f7@www.novabbs.com> <vsj0nm$1bsmo$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vsj0nm$1bsmo$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 57
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 11:33:52 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2558
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <18327d2ba85c3c5b$885443$1488192$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2948

W dniu 02.04.2025 o 11:45, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
> Den 01.04.2025 23:24, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 18:38:32 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 01.04.2025 19:42, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 20:40:23 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Do muons move at a different velocity in the laboratory than in the
>>>>> atmosphere?
>>>>>
>>>>> "No, muons generally do not move at a different velocity in a 
>>>>> laboratory
>>>>> setting compared to their velocity in the atmosphere; they both travel
>>>>> at speeds very close to the speed of light, typically around 99.8% of
>>>>> the speed of light" - Google search AI.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then why would they "time dilate" in the atmosphere?
>>>
>>>> This argument proves that muons do not time dilate in the atmosphere
>>>> because the alleged cause is absent.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your logical analyses are mind blowing!
>>>
>>> Congratulation! :-D
> 
>> It's mind-blowing that you're dodging the question! According to
>> relativity, what allegedly causes the time dilation of the muons? If the
>> speed is the same, what is the cause?
> 
> Your "question" is so nonsensical that the all that can be understood
> is that you have no clue.
> 
> Here is the very short explanation of what the "time dilation" is.
> 
> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs

Paul, poor piece of shit, there is not even such thing
as a "stationary muon", another branch of your moronic
religion is forbidding that.



> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
> 
> This is time dilation.

Nope, this is lifetime of moving muon measured longer
than the lifetime of a stationary one (forgetting
for a moment that there are no such things).

> 
> It is a measured FACT.

Buhahahahahahahaha.