Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:40:46 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <vsh92t$3mltr$1@dont-email.me> <d6b9dd687bfe1c27ced89d9c3657a2f5@www.novabbs.com> <vsj1ic$1bsmo$4@dont-email.me> <ef95885e389152006e41ef66ab321103@www.novabbs.com> <vslg09$52m4$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vslg09$52m4$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 32
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 08:40:46 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1891
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1832c24e31e3f8de$1447573$1481196$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2282

W dniu 03.04.2025 o 10:18, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
> Den 02.04.2025 19:58, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:00:04 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 01.04.2025 21:06, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>> It's easy to understand that the lifetime of the muons is longer and
>>>> that time dilation is an illogical fiction divorced from physics.
> 
>>>
>>> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
>>> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
>>>
>>> These are measured facts!
>>>
>>> You claim this is easy to understand without using SR,
>>> so please explain why muons live longer when they are moving.
> 
>> Interpretations are not facts. Time dilation is an interpretation. An
>> illogical and pseudo-scientific 
> 
> You can't interpret facts to be not facts,
> but you can interpret facts.
> 
> The measured facts are:
> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
> 
> THESE ARE FACTS, not interpretations of FACTS!

No, trash, THESE ARE not. THESE ARE
interpretation of FACTS.