Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:43:24 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <vsh92t$3mltr$1@dont-email.me> <d6b9dd687bfe1c27ced89d9c3657a2f5@www.novabbs.com> <vsj1ic$1bsmo$4@dont-email.me> <bde61d4704e1b6144732c8f6cf68e021@www.novabbs.com> <vslh71$52m4$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vslh71$52m4$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 35
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 08:43:25 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2209
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1832c27304caff0f$1447574$1481196$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2600

W dniu 03.04.2025 o 10:39, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
> Den 02.04.2025 23:33, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:00:04 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 01.04.2025 21:06, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>> It's easy to understand that the lifetime of the muons is longer and
>>>> that time dilation is an illogical fiction divorced from physics.
>>>
>>> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
>>> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
>>>
>>> These are measured facts!
>>>
>>> You claim this is easy to understand without using SR,
>>> so please explain why muons live longer when they are moving.
> 
>> Paul, I do not know why they live longer. I know time dilation is
>> fiction. Surely, they can't go faster than light. Heaven forbid!
> 
> The measured FACTS are:
> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
> 
> Do you really not understand how ridiculous it is to claim
> that these facts do not exist because you "know" they can't exist?
> 
> You don't know the difference between science and religion.
> 
> You _believe_ SR is nonsense, and ignore facts to keep your faith.

You don't know the difference between science and religion.
You _believe_ that not even consistent mumble of
an insane guru, so you're interpreting everything
to match it and sell those interpretations as facts.