Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:10:55 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <vsh92t$3mltr$1@dont-email.me> <d6b9dd687bfe1c27ced89d9c3657a2f5@www.novabbs.com> <vsj1ic$1bsmo$4@dont-email.me> <bde61d4704e1b6144732c8f6cf68e021@www.novabbs.com> <vslh71$52m4$3@dont-email.me> <1f71496841d33e33c17081dab4e92631@www.novabbs.com> <vsokjd$3felk$1@dont-email.me> <0ffd2692c0b472758475dd0a8ba91df1@www.novabbs.com> <vsqt2b$1s7ad$1@dont-email.me> <82d34151bd36f84d89ac906714d15a7a@www.novabbs.com> <vsumc4$1qumn$1@dont-email.me> <1833d3a0a6f8074c$938345$1488192$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <993340f7d095717f836896c1a6640f20@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <993340f7d095717f836896c1a6640f20@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 36
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 05:10:54 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2406
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1833f12c7e582a92$1000435$1488192$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2788

W dniu 07.04.2025 o 01:30, LaurenceClarkCrossen pisze:
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 20:09:28 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> 
>> W dniu 06.04.2025 o 22:02, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>>> Den 05.04.2025 22:53, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>> Your calculations do not explain the cause.
>>>>
>>>> SR cannot predict without a cause, and you haven't given the cause.
>>>
>>> Everything SR predicts is a consequence of the postulates of SR.
>>> What other "cause" do you want?
>>>
>>> But SR doesn't _cause_ anything. That it predicts exactly what
>>> is measured means that SR is not falsified by muon experiments.
>>
>> Too bad it's only measured in some sick
>> imagination of a brainwashed idiot.
> I must say I find the whole matter quite perplexing.
> 
> I thought time dilation was an effect not a cause.
> 
> I am told a muon in its own frame lasts one microsecond yet covers the
> distance requiring 22.

You're told. Nothing supports this wildassertion and a muon doesn't even 
have
a frame (thanks to the nonsenses of QM).

Most of "measurements" a relativistic idiot
is invoking have never been performed - the
idiot has only imagined them. The ones
that have really been performed - well, they
were prepared to give the correct result...
a measurement is always prepared to that.