Reply-To: rudy.c@kone.net
Subject: Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court
Newsgroups: can.politics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,seattle.politics
References: <b7f7cb11b00cd121577bc5b86c8f2f1a@dizum.com> <uvgq0klhkeuu3dg7h1q8nr2kaqutghch30@4ax.com> <vuk12m$e9u$11@gallifrey.nk.ca> <dr5s0kt8p4bi3uldqmho0e0pk2v4a5lvgj@4ax.com> <vul6ak$3td$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Followup-To: alt.asshole
From: Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 09:51:43 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vul6ak$3td$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 54
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.thecubenet.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 13:51:42 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2679
Organization: theCubeNet - www.thecubenet.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@thecubenet.com
Message-Id: <183a31337f6f4af7$34915$4491$6add606a@news.thecubenet.com>
Bytes: 3076

The Binky Doctor wrote:
> In article <dr5s0kt8p4bi3uldqmho0e0pk2v4a5lvgj@4ax.com>,
> Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>>>>> US laws have no implication in Canada.
>>>>
>>>> You're referring to my sig as if it's part of my argument about trans
>>>> rights in Canada?  What gives?
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Joel W. Crump
>>>>
>>>> Amendment XIV
>>>> Section 1.
>>>>
>>>> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>> protection of the laws.
>>>>
>>>> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>
>>> That law has nothing to do with Canadian Politics.
>>
>>
>> I was talking about something other than my sig, you are ignoring
>> that.  So your response has nothing to do with any post in any group
>> in this thread.
>>
> 
> Then why bring up US Law in can.politics?
> 
>> -- 
>> Joel W. Crump
>>
>> Amendment XIV
>> Section 1.
>>
>> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>> protection of the laws.
>>
>> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
> 
> 
This is cross posted to six groups, binky, you stupid fuck.