Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:33:51 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The Schwarzschild Metric has been refuted.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <c5b55811f1d9185c218d02d03bc8e44b@www.novabbs.com> <vunhqg$2vtup$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vunhqg$2vtup$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 29
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:33:52 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1588
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <183a71b619ad6615$80375$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1969

On 4/28/2025 11:29 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2025-04-25 16:10:42 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
> 
>> This metric doubles the Newtonian deflection, so the relativity
>> derivation is invalid.
>>
>> "Using the Newton’s Theory of Gravity to Calculate the
>> Deflection of Light in the Solar System and the Orbital
>> Poles of Light’s Motion of General Relativity"
>> Mei Xiaochun
> 
> Actual measurements of the deflection support General Relativity.
> So do the measurements of light travel times. Newtonian gravity
> does not say anything about light.


In the meantime in the real world, however -
forbidden by your insane church "improper"
clocks keep measuring "improper" t'=t in
"improper" seconds.


With the additional hypthesis
> that light is a stream of particles with small but non-zero mass,
> which hypothesis is compatible with Newtonian optics, the deflection
> can be computed. The result is refuted by observations

In early XIXth century.